A few minor comments remain, but nice drawing! - The RAM launcher is facing forwards, I suspect it's standard position would be facing aft? - I can't really understand the bridge wing. The shading underneath it suggests it is an overhang, but it's grey line outline says it is flush with the superstr...
Uhm that is not how that works. http://www.shipbucket.com/license For Shipbucket work posted on this website or the Shipbucket forum, additional requirements apply: Remixes / alterations: You must keep the drawing in the existing template, maintaining the scale bar, class & type information, author ...
Uhm when there are multiple aircraft are on the same template and they don't all have the same author, shouldn't the individual images be credited? as not all authors should be credited if somebody takes an individual aircraft from the template and decides to work on it or use it elsewhere.
Yeah, I gotta join in with Erik here: while it is impressive as a drawing, the design has major flaws to the point of being impossible. - I really think that the double size elevator is not a great idea. the bigger the hole in the side of the hull, the bigger the stress concentration and added reinf...
Churchill WTT The Churchill WTT (Wet Terrain Tank) was in most ways, definitely not a Churchill tank. In its origins, it was meant to be a heavy tank that could go where normally no tanks (let alone heavy tanks) could operate: soft ground, riverbeds, amphibious landings etc. It was conceived as part...
That's quite interesting! Those might very well have been the last ships being fitted with the Mk 25, but at the same time one of the first WM egg installations IIRC.
Are you certain the WM egg would have been used as the FCS for the sea sparrow? I have never seen the WM egg being coupled with an Mk 25 launcher, as the Mk 25 was the launcher for BPDMS and the WM was used for Nato Sea Sparrow, which always used the Mk 29 launcher.
Quick links
FAQ
Register
Login