yeah, using the modified bracket or something like that is fine, I just mean that these should not be rules set in stone, but looked at what is good to do on case-by-case basis. My personal rule for the years in the title was include it if it is included on the ships image or if I was familiar enoug...
No, I don't agree on the never build designs date. Without the ability to compare designs, we would not need the database driven archive. The title would always show the design date, but the year in the database would represent when this ship could be operational. Sure, that is a bit harder on the p...
Re: the years or dates in the title: I would always add this if known, for the simple reason that we don't know if other artists (or the same, at a later date) is going to add another 'date' of the same ship. In addition, never build designs often have 'as described in 19XX' while the year as drawn ...
Since the new templates with the sb watermark have been introduced 7.5 years ago, I suspect basically all drawings you started collecting did not have it haha. That said, this is exactly why the watermark was added, but what is implied here is the books author downloading the images from sb. Normall...
I have to admit I do not quite follow the coloration scheme you have used, with the lighter grey lines on the hull and the huge amount of shades on the mast, while there is no shading on the outside of the SSM launchers? It is a nice drawing, on first glance, but the more I look at it the more stran...
Quick links
FAQ
Register
Login