Search found 7044 matches

[ Search found 7044 matches ]  Go to page 1 2 3 4 5705 »
Author Message

 Forum: Personal Designs  Topic: Natsuzuki Postwar Modernisation - WIP

 Post subject: Re: Natsuzuki Postwar Modernisation - WIP Posted: August 8th, 2018, 8:32 pm 

Replies: 8
Views: 951


2 C1's seems overkill to me as well. I would instead try to optimise the secondary director arrangements, the Friesland had 2 on the aft superstructure and 2 on the bridge wings for example. Note that the C1 was not an standalone system, it was coupled to an optical sight in front of it. Similarly, ...

 Forum: Personal Designs  Topic: Natsuzuki Postwar Modernisation - WIP

 Post subject: Re: Natsuzuki Postwar Modernisation - WIP Posted: August 8th, 2018, 10:01 am 

Replies: 8
Views: 951


yes, the C1 was the primary fire control director for both the cruisers and the Friesland class. That drawing is the least possible and likely of all friesland configurations, and I have never seen any proof of it existing in real life...... I could be wrong, but I doubt that concept is real. The fo...

 Forum: Personal Designs  Topic: Natsuzuki Postwar Modernisation - WIP

 Post subject: Re: Natsuzuki Postwar Modernisation - WIP Posted: August 7th, 2018, 10:32 pm 

Replies: 8
Views: 951


Seems you have used the Dutch Holland class as a base. Keep in mind though, that the Holland class had an watered down fire control system, due to the earlier designs having topweight problems as the design process progressed. This means the Holland class has 2 directors for 2 120mm turrets and 1 40...

 Forum: Personal Designs  Topic: Fast battleship challenge! (Ended)

 Post subject: Re: Fast battleship challenge! (Ended) Posted: July 27th, 2018, 9:47 pm 

Replies: 158
Views: 26289


Agreed, it would be great to see them on the wiki page, similar to how I uploaded the NATO ASW challenge there, making certain these drawings keep serving as an inspiration in the future! I am willing to help out with that, but I will not do all the work myself for a challenge I was no part of :P an...

 Forum: Parts Sheets Discussion  Topic: Some new parts

 Post subject: Re: Some new parts Posted: July 27th, 2018, 9:44 pm 

Replies: 2
Views: 928


Making use of this excellent thread (and with permission from Charguizard), I post here a list of parts I and others have updated, which were posted on the wiki but not on here yet. I will try to keep doing so when updating/creating parts, so people get notified of updates and have a chance to comme...

 Forum: Alternate Universe Designs  Topic: Thiaria: Reboot

 Post subject: Re: Thiaria: Reboot Posted: July 15th, 2018, 8:01 pm 

Replies: 313
Views: 89773


amazing work, just one little thing: check the capitalization of the categories when you upload to the wiki :P all your drawings are now in the non-existent category 'Alternate Universe Drawings' and the ones of all other people in 'Alternate Universe drawings'

 Forum: Real Designs  Topic: DD Sumner FRAM II

 Post subject: Re: DD Sumner FRAM II Posted: July 13th, 2018, 2:50 pm 

Replies: 15
Views: 3841


Haha that SPS-40 has been around for at least a year now Erik :P but I agree, if I do say so myself, it does look great.

 Forum: Alternate Universe Designs  Topic: Dominion of Newfoundland and Labrador

 Post subject: Re: Dominion of Newfoundland and Labrador Posted: July 10th, 2018, 12:56 pm 

Replies: 62
Views: 15467


Only 2 minor comments: we have better looking LCVP's and vehicle doors drawn in shipbucket :P Other then that, looking very good!

 Forum: Personal Designs  Topic: Dallas class cruiser (World of Warships)

 Post subject: Re: Dallas class cruiser (World of Warships) Posted: July 8th, 2018, 10:02 am 

Replies: 26
Views: 6712


Somehow, they made the ship slightly heavier, 2 meters wider, added 2 more guns, and 2500 hp of power, and ended up with the same speed? They also ended up with an block coefficient of 0,38 (quite very low)........ is it just me or did they fail before they started modelling? Did they really think t...

 Forum: Real Designs  Topic: Karel Doorman Class Frigates

 Post subject: Re: Karel Doorman Class Frigates Posted: July 8th, 2018, 9:38 am 

Replies: 2
Views: 872


that M frigate drawing seems to be missing some overhang shadings (I spotted on underneath the aft STIR platform on the mast, haven't searched for others) and the overhang shading that is there seems very light, especially compared with the one under the bridge wings which extend IIRC about the same...
Display: Sort by: Direction:
Go to advanced search [ Search found 7044 matches ]  Go to page 1 2 3 4 5705 »


Contact us | The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Jump to: 

cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]