Search found 35 matches

[ Search found 35 matches ]  Go to page 1 2 3 4 »
Author Message

 Forum: Beginners Only  Topic: FFLX/FFGX

 Post subject: Re: FFLX/FFGX Posted: March 14th, 2013, 4:36 pm 

Replies: 113
Views: 64698


You listed some wars but didn't explain why they were good example supporting your hypothesis; in fact I think they do not support your hypothesis. FFGX with simplified radar seems like a decent idea. But I would describe it rather as an ASW sloop rather than a police cruiser; it fills a role that's...

 Forum: Beginners Only  Topic: FFLX/FFGX

 Post subject: Re: FFLX/FFGX Posted: March 14th, 2013, 7:23 am 

Replies: 113
Views: 64698


You have been provided with myraid, but Iran is a good example mentioned twice now. Libya is an even better one. Or any ESG/ARG/CSG that needs self defense capabilities without the bells and whistles, so pretty much one anywhere other than off the coast of China. Right now they have DDGs in tow twi...

 Forum: Beginners Only  Topic: FFLX/FFGX

 Post subject: Re: FFLX/FFGX Posted: March 13th, 2013, 10:58 pm 

Replies: 113
Views: 64698


I am indeed not going to individually respond to each of the several paragraphs you make in response to every sentence I write. This is in the interests of time, preserving my sanity, and not crashing the server after half a dozen iterations of exponential post length increase. It is not meant as an...

 Forum: Beginners Only  Topic: FFLX/FFGX

 Post subject: Re: FFLX/FFGX Posted: March 13th, 2013, 9:54 pm 

Replies: 113
Views: 64698


1. Your OP specifically says it can fire SM2. Read the thread, that requirement was removed. You will not is not included in the weapons envelopes provided. 2. The stated load out even without SM2 is equivalent to a lot of European first-line warships. They don't cost $350m. FREMM for instance has ...

 Forum: Beginners Only  Topic: FFLX/FFGX

 Post subject: Re: FFLX/FFGX Posted: March 13th, 2013, 9:08 am 

Replies: 113
Views: 64698


You exclude AEGIS and SPY and instead fit a newer radar with equivalent or greater (?) functionality, paired with the regular Mk 41 VLS. Cost saving comes only from smaller size as far as I can see, while overall complexity of systems increases. There's no obvious saving here and a good chance of b...

 Forum: Beginners Only  Topic: FFLX/FFGX

 Post subject: Re: FFLX/FFGX Posted: March 12th, 2013, 10:54 pm 

Replies: 113
Views: 64698


You exclude AEGIS and SPY and instead fit a newer radar with equivalent or greater (?) functionality, paired with the regular Mk 41 VLS. Cost saving comes only from smaller size as far as I can see, while overall complexity of systems increases. There's no obvious saving here and a good chance of be...

 Forum: Beginners Only  Topic: FFLX/FFGX

 Post subject: Re: FFLX/FFGX Posted: March 12th, 2013, 9:58 pm 

Replies: 113
Views: 64698


Your solution to the problem of designing a cheaper ship than Arleigh Burke for low intensity missions seems to be to build an even more advanced ship that is scaled down about to about 75% the size. I wouldn't be surprised if a RL build of "Trident" ended up costing more than Flight III Arleigh Bur...

 Forum: Off Topic  Topic: A Hoax? The Qaher F-313 "super advanced" stealth fighter

 Post subject: Re: A Hoax? The Qaher F-313 "super advanced" stealth fighter Posted: February 5th, 2013, 8:43 pm 

Replies: 37
Views: 18781


[ img ]

When is this going in the archive?

And I mean to insult no-one, unlike Timothy in his post.

 Forum: Off Topic  Topic: Russo-Japanese Naval Warfare 1904-1905

 Post subject: Re: Russo-Japanese Naval Warfare 1904-1905 Posted: February 5th, 2013, 8:32 pm 

Replies: 8
Views: 5173


I am not an editor, however I may buy this book when it is finished. Keep us informed.

 Forum: Off Topic  Topic: A Hoax? The Qaher F-313 "super advanced" stealth fighter

 Post subject: Re: A Hoax? The Qaher F-313 "super advanced" stealth fighter Posted: February 5th, 2013, 8:28 pm 

Replies: 37
Views: 18781


TimothyC wrote:
APDAF wrote:
Snip
Irrelevant.
Get back to me when you produce a drawing that can go in the archive.
You seem to have the same non-notable WIP in your signature as when I checked this site last year.
Display: Sort by: Direction:
Go to advanced search [ Search found 35 matches ]  Go to page 1 2 3 4 »


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Jump to: 

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]