I concur with others critics about aft stern-underwater details Midway 1985 https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f8/USS_Midway_%28CV-41%29_screws%2C_1985.jpg https://nara-media-001.s3.amazonaws.com/arcmedia/stillpix/330-cfd/1985/DN-ST-85-13348.jpeg https://cdn10.picryl.com/photo/1985/05/...
I'd mention the one from Lacroix and Wells "Japanese cruiser of the Pacific War", which is usually regarded as one of the most reasearched books on the matter. "Japanese Cruiser of the Pacific War" (Eric Lacroix & Linton Wells II, Naval Institute Press, Anaapolis Maryland, USA, 1997 ). Hummm, not s...
It is remarkable how abrasive some people can be. Maybe ban all of the obnoxious smileys and force everyone to communicate like an adult (or see if they're able). Instead of insulting, Instead of focusing on "the shape of the mesages" , "concentrate on the background" focus on : - historical facts ...
Ergo your comments are de facto irrelevant. LOL Not really. Even by 1942 : - you main caliber-gun look wrong (360mm for B-65, only 310mm for B-64 ;) ) - In 1942 you seaplane were FULLY wrong for the future main capital-ship to be completed in the next years ;) - Even in 1942, you need to add the ea...
LOL Stop "copying and pasting", stop reading on wikipedia Wrong drawing For a ship designed in 1942 (B-65) (B-64 designed in 1939-1941) , think : - keel laying in 1943 - hull launched in 1945 - commissioned around 1946-1947 :? = Japanese main warship completed by 1946-1947 = - your seaplane is total...
Naturally clear close up photos of this area after the 1945 refit are nonexistent. If you have a clear photo of the area showing the loading machine facing forward I will be happy to correct it.
Indeed, I have not (yet) found an interesting ref/pics