Search found 8297 matches

[ Search found 8297 matches ]  Go to page 1 2 3 4 5830 »
Author Message

 Forum: General Discussion  Topic: ANNOUNCEMENT: Site archive wiped

 Post subject: Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: Site archive wiped Posted: October 21st, 2018, 9:29 pm 

Replies: 78
Views: 4411


Re: Early design KD - Yeah, in general "early concepts/designs/etc." for longer classes I prefer to create separate SHIP entry (for example, there's similar situation with Holland 1947A early designs). Though if the ship in RL was one-off (or there were, say, just two in the class) the designs/conce...

 Forum: General Discussion  Topic: ANNOUNCEMENT: Site archive wiped

 Post subject: Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: Site archive wiped Posted: October 21st, 2018, 8:38 pm 

Replies: 78
Views: 4411


In principle, yes, I considered Netherlands, both RL and NW sections, to be done (albeit as "uploaded what I know about, but certainly not everything that was ever drawn for these sections but for various reasons was not necessarily preserved") Re: Mahu - well, it's not an active-duty warship either...

 Forum: Off Topic  Topic: My Book - The Admiralty and the Helicopter

 Post subject: Re: My Book - The Admiralty and the Helicopter Posted: October 21st, 2018, 11:08 am 

Replies: 5
Views: 126


Great to hear it has been finally published! :D

 Forum: General Discussion  Topic: ANNOUNCEMENT: Site archive wiped

 Post subject: Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: Site archive wiped Posted: October 20th, 2018, 5:21 pm 

Replies: 78
Views: 4411


Ah, I see. Well, in this case, I guess we could just leave things as they are for now.

Update (21 October) - Netherlands uploaded.

 Forum: General Discussion  Topic: ANNOUNCEMENT: Site archive wiped

 Post subject: Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: Site archive wiped Posted: October 20th, 2018, 5:13 pm 

Replies: 78
Views: 4411


There are already several drawings in the archive that differ just with the name on the hull (and in the caption). ;) Btw. what about changes made to vessels during their lifetime - were they visually always the same on Dokkums and Wildervanks? If not, then I'd say that creating such series represen...

 Forum: General Discussion  Topic: ANNOUNCEMENT: Site archive wiped

 Post subject: Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: Site archive wiped Posted: October 20th, 2018, 4:57 pm 

Replies: 78
Views: 4411


Re: Eendracht - no problem with moving it to Sailing Ships. I saw it named both as tall ship and as "large yacht", and both looked plausible to me. Re: Marlin - the White Marlin is already as separate class, while Blue and Black Marlins are described as single class in Wiki, which isn't perhaps the ...

 Forum: General Discussion  Topic: ANNOUNCEMENT: Site archive wiped

 Post subject: Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: Site archive wiped Posted: October 20th, 2018, 4:30 pm 

Replies: 78
Views: 4411


Ok, so let it be.

Btw. if You'll fix any errors, please either mention it here or PM me, so I wouldn't accidentialy un-fix it later (or so I could express separate opinion about that fixing ;) )

 Forum: General Discussion  Topic: ANNOUNCEMENT: Site archive wiped

 Post subject: Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: Site archive wiped Posted: October 20th, 2018, 4:22 pm 

Replies: 78
Views: 4411


Ok, we can make Johannes Frederik, Arie Visser and SAR-1500 as separate classes.
Would You consider it ok to make the class names as following:

Johannes Frederik
Arie Visser (Johannes Frederik)
SAR-1500 (Johannes Frederik)

(brackets emphasizing the relationship between the designs)

 Forum: General Discussion  Topic: ANNOUNCEMENT: Site archive wiped

 Post subject: Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: Site archive wiped Posted: October 20th, 2018, 4:06 pm 

Replies: 78
Views: 4411


@Acelanceloet Polish SAR-1500's were built by Damen. Well, it's indeed my fault that when I read that Polish SAR-1500's (with "SAR-" particle as part of class designation) were built at shipyard belonging to Damen conglomerate and "under Damen license" I assumed it was their design. (And I'd argue a...

 Forum: FD Scale Drawings  Topic: Fleet Air defence fighter of 1980 challenge

 Post subject: Re: Fleet Air defence fighter of 1980 challenge Posted: October 19th, 2018, 10:05 pm 

Replies: 61
Views: 9033


I like the overall idea of Yugoslav carrier-borne fighter, but IMHO sticking tail from MiG-21 to Orao is a no-go, simply because completely different geommetry. In essence: the tube would be attached to a box - one of them clearly would have to be very, very deeply redesigned. Btw. wasn't the Orao m...
Display: Sort by: Direction:
Go to advanced search [ Search found 8297 matches ]  Go to page 1 2 3 4 5830 »


Contact us | The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Jump to: 

cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]