Search found 2662 matches

[ Search found 2662 matches ]  Go to page 1 2 3 4 5267 »
Author Message

 Forum: Real Designs  Topic: HMS Queen Elizabeth (R08)

 Post subject: Re: HMS Queen Elizabeth (R08) Posted: August 12th, 2018, 10:53 am 

Replies: 22
Views: 1675


Ooh, didn't see this coming! That said, I'm not a fan of the panel lines and as hood mentions, the shading is perhaps a little extreme but otherwise it seems top notch.

 Forum: Alternate Universe Designs  Topic: Nigeria AU

 Post subject: Re: Nigeria AU Posted: July 25th, 2018, 9:27 pm 

Replies: 46
Views: 11003


I suppose I should probably use these rather than the ones I drew. :?

 Forum: Never-Built Designs  Topic: New RN Frigates

 Post subject: Re: New RN Frigates Posted: July 24th, 2018, 7:42 pm 

Replies: 111
Views: 34677


It's in the PDF and Waterwings has already had a stab at it using it as a reference I believe.

 Forum: Alternate Universe Designs  Topic: The Dominion of Westralia

 Post subject: Re: The Dominion of Westralia Posted: June 12th, 2018, 4:26 pm 

Replies: 75
Views: 20529


I'm still dubious. My personal opinion having looked at numerous different ways of doing Leander and Leander-based schemes is to have the Mk.22 in place of the 4.5" twin and then replace the Mk.22 in its current position with an Otobreda 76mm or similar. In essence, a mini Perry.

 Forum: Alternate Universe Designs  Topic: The Dominion of Westralia

 Post subject: Re: The Dominion of Westralia Posted: June 8th, 2018, 5:47 pm 

Replies: 75
Views: 20529


Neat, they certainly look the part though I'm not sold on the amidships Mk.22.

Also, FYI there is a newer Wildcat available
[ img ]

 Forum: Personal Designs  Topic: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge

 Post subject: Re: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge Posted: April 29th, 2018, 1:23 pm 

Replies: 142
Views: 24965


Neat. I wonder if you could go down the route of the Amphions for the second pair and use unitised machinery.

 Forum: Off Topic  Topic: Split: RN Designs Argument

 Post subject: Re: Royal Navy Interwar Captial Ships Posted: April 18th, 2018, 8:38 pm 

Replies: 5
Views: 880


@Blackbuck, [img]https://i.imgur.com/LgE2oxo.png[img] Good luck to differentiate (VISUALLY SPEAKING) your 4.7"BD and the 4.5" Mk I/Mk III mount....(except 2-3 pixels) My opinion, boy, before drawing a Gun-mounting, finds the full COMPLETE DIFFERENCE/FULL SIDE-LINE/CUTAWAY , & add it to the official...

 Forum: Never-Built Designs  Topic: Royal Navy Interwar Captial Ships

 Post subject: Re: Royal Navy Interwar Captial Ships Posted: April 18th, 2018, 8:01 pm 

Replies: 208
Views: 80862


You really are a giant cockwomble aren't you. Even when you're WRONG you feel the need to act like an ass to people. The development process of what would become the 4.5" BD mounts started in the 1920s with a successor to the 4.7" HA guns used on the Nelrods. Initially, the 4.7" calibre was carried ...

 Forum: Never-Built Designs  Topic: Royal Navy Interwar Captial Ships

 Post subject: Re: Royal Navy Interwar Captial Ships Posted: April 18th, 2018, 5:10 pm 

Replies: 208
Views: 80862


Except the design shows and identifies them as 4.7" BD mounts, had they not been dropped they are what would have been shipped, so they are perfectly correct.

Next time, perhaps do a little more research Mike before calling someone out.

 Forum: Personal Designs  Topic: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge

 Post subject: Re: Treaty Cruiser Design Challenge Posted: April 17th, 2018, 8:46 pm 

Replies: 142
Views: 24965


The Zaras made in excess of 90k on two shafts I believe, so yes.
Display: Sort by: Direction:
Go to advanced search [ Search found 2662 matches ]  Go to page 1 2 3 4 5267 »


Contact us | The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Jump to: 

cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]