Search found 2779 matches

[ Search found 2779 matches ]  Go to page « 1274 275 276 277 278 »
Author Message

 Forum: Alternate Universe Designs  Topic: Epicnopolis- Designs for a friend's AU

 Post subject: Re: Epicnopolis- Designs for a friend's AU Posted: August 14th, 2010, 4:18 am 

Replies: 60
Views: 49258


Perhaps Nulka is bulkier than you think. There's plenty of space for it literally anywhere except on top of the SLQ-32. Put it abeam the no-longer-functional aft-facing windows.

 Forum: Alternate Universe Designs  Topic: Epicnopolis- Designs for a friend's AU

 Post subject: Re: Epicnopolis- Designs for a friend's AU Posted: August 14th, 2010, 12:32 am 

Replies: 60
Views: 49258


Nulka tends to go amidships; I suspect that this is important, as you want the new radar target to come out of the center of the old one. You've used SeaRAM, with all-onboard radar. That's not necessary on a major combatant (certainly not something with Aegis!) - trade it out for the standard RAM bo...

 Forum: Personal Designs  Topic: 255m LWL Soviet C(B)GN

 Post subject: Re: 255m LWL Soviet C(B)GN Posted: August 12th, 2010, 3:13 pm 

Replies: 39
Views: 42194


As has been said a million times, missiles and gun barrels are always over-scale to some degree. Someday I hope people will actually remember.

 Forum: Off Topic  Topic: taking some time away...

 Post subject: Re: taking some time away... Posted: August 12th, 2010, 3:40 am 

Replies: 17
Views: 16637


Congratulations. Keep your priorities straight... we'll be here when you return, whenever that might be!

 Forum: Beginners Only  Topic: IoT (Isle of Texas)

 Post subject: Re: IoT (Isle of Texas) Posted: August 12th, 2010, 2:23 am 

Replies: 172
Views: 118378


Nope. a) Missiles are not exactly optional if you're spending the volume and topweight on SPS-48. b) If Kidd/Tico could have the rear Mk 26 further aft, they would. Those ships are largely length-constrained (Kidd particularly). Any Mk 26 further aft than on those classes (on a hull of vaguely simil...

 Forum: Official Parts Sheets  Topic: RN Weapon and Radar Sheets

 Post subject: Re: RN Weapon and Radar Sheets Posted: August 12th, 2010, 2:21 am 

Replies: 468
Views: 460115


My limited understanding concurs with this fellow. Be nice to the new guy, everyone.

 Forum: Personal Designs  Topic: 255m LWL Soviet C(B)GN

 Post subject: Re: 255m LWL Soviet C(B)GN Posted: August 12th, 2010, 12:01 am 

Replies: 39
Views: 42194


My AU parts are always welcome on well-thought-out designs and never welcome on ill-conceived nonsense, regardless of the artist.

 Forum: Alternate Universe Designs  Topic: Epicnopolis- Designs for a friend's AU

 Post subject: Re: Epicnopolis- Designs for a friend's AU Posted: August 11th, 2010, 12:25 am 

Replies: 60
Views: 49258


It's kind of funky. For a ship with no major anti-air weapons, I cannot imagine the purpose for both SPS-48 and SPY-1. You sure don't need three major illuminators for this ship. All you'll be doing is local air control, for which SPY-1 is more than sufficient. At that point... do you even need the ...

 Forum: Beginners Only  Topic: IoT (Isle of Texas)

 Post subject: Re: IoT (Isle of Texas) Posted: August 11th, 2010, 12:15 am 

Replies: 172
Views: 118378


The radar might possibly be doable (see the insane installation on the missile-converted Forrest Shermans), but there just isn't enough hull depth aft even for a medium gun, let alone a Mk 26. As best I can determine, Mk 26 requires about 22ft by 22ft of depth and width belowdecks. That is a shitloa...

 Forum: Never-Built Designs  Topic: Project 1144

 Post subject: Re: Project 1144 Posted: August 10th, 2010, 8:16 pm 

Replies: 19
Views: 27049


I do not see any issues, other than the fact that you don't really need to show two identical SSMs up on the missile line.
Display: Sort by: Direction:
Go to advanced search [ Search found 2779 matches ]  Go to page « 1274 275 276 277 278 »


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Jump to: 

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]