Search found 440 matches
[ Search found 440 matches ]  Go to page « 1 … 38 39 40 41 42 … 44 »
Author Message

 Forum: Real Designs  Topic: USS Drum SS-228 1945

Erusia Force
 Post subject: Re: USS Drum SS-228 1945 Posted: March 4th, 2012, 11:43 pm 

Replies: 52
Views: 30193


Added other hull details.

 Forum: Beginners Only  Topic: EFNS H-11 Type Heavy BBGMN Design

Erusia Force
 Post subject: Re: EFNS H-11 Type Heavy BBGMN Design Posted: March 4th, 2012, 1:50 am 

Replies: 82
Views: 40166


SPY-1 type radars re-arranged and superstructure further armored and enlarged. This should make a little more sense.

 Forum: Real Designs  Topic: USS Drum SS-228 1945

Erusia Force
 Post subject: Re: USS Drum SS-228 1945 Posted: February 28th, 2012, 4:36 am 

Replies: 52
Views: 30193


Im not quite sure, Ive been up close to the propellors, and from what I could tell it was not a coating on brass, but rather a silver colored metal.

 Forum: Beginners Only  Topic: EFNS H-11 Type Heavy BBGMN Design

Erusia Force
 Post subject: Re: EFNS H-11 Type Heavy BBGMN Design Posted: February 26th, 2012, 11:53 pm 

Replies: 82
Views: 40166


CWIS will be placed in areas 100 feet from barrel reach as a limit. The spacing between A and B turret will be tightened to provide more room for missiles. As for radar on the guns, they are of sturdy construction, the main aiming radar for the gunst are positioned on high places of superstructures ...

 Forum: Real Designs  Topic: USS Drum SS-228 1945

Erusia Force
 Post subject: Re: USS Drum SS-228 1945 Posted: February 26th, 2012, 1:12 pm 

Replies: 52
Views: 30193


This should be the final cut, If anyone sees any further mistakes please let me know.

 Forum: Off Topic  Topic: Battleship Design Fun

Erusia Force
 Post subject: Re: Battleship Design Fun Posted: February 26th, 2012, 2:13 am 

Replies: 52
Views: 28068


Furthermore, why replace when you can renovate, for instance, USS Kitty Hawk and USS Constellation could be improved and prove suitable for further service, yet instead they sit as storage.

 Forum: Off Topic  Topic: Battleship Design Fun

Erusia Force
 Post subject: Re: Battleship Design Fun Posted: February 26th, 2012, 2:08 am 

Replies: 52
Views: 28068


However, they also make fine targets, large ones at that. Yes, smaller carriers make equally opportune targets, yet they are not as costly to lose as a nuclear carrier and it's 5000 men.

 Forum: Off Topic  Topic: Battleship Design Fun

Erusia Force
 Post subject: Re: Battleship Design Fun Posted: February 26th, 2012, 1:33 am 

Replies: 52
Views: 28068


hell Im actually against the construction of nuclear carriers because they're TOO BIG AND EXPENSIVE! (we should revert to small carriers and UAVs, that would be more than enough and save us billions.) Not if you want it to perform the same mission as the current carriers. First of all if you want t...

 Forum: Off Topic  Topic: Battleship Design Fun

Erusia Force
 Post subject: Re: Battleship Design Fun Posted: February 26th, 2012, 1:28 am 

Replies: 52
Views: 28068


Did I hear d-1000 Zumwalt?? It probably just me..

 Forum: Off Topic  Topic: Battleship Design Fun

Erusia Force
 Post subject: Re: Battleship Design Fun Posted: February 26th, 2012, 1:26 am 

Replies: 52
Views: 28068


Colosseum wrote:
[ img ]

[ img ]

:o :lol: :lol: :lol: I seriously just lolled, and coughed up a lung :oops:
Display: Sort by: Direction:
Go to advanced search [ Search found 440 matches ]  Go to page « 1 … 38 39 40 41 42 … 44 »


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Jump to: 

cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]