Search found 46 matches

[ Search found 46 matches ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5 »
Author Message

 Forum: Off Topic  Topic: Comparing ships for naval wargaming

 Post subject: Re: Comparing ships for naval wargaming Posted: August 15th, 2017, 10:44 pm 

Replies: 17
Views: 17601


The jump from St. Louis to Phoenix is awkward, but a necessary weasel if we don't want to have the lower tier American CL line be entirely paper. :lol: aww but i love paper ship The Worcester needs to be balanced against the Des Moines, but those two are going to be in the top tier regardless of an...

 Forum: Off Topic  Topic: Comparing ships for naval wargaming

 Post subject: Re: Comparing ships for naval wargaming Posted: August 15th, 2017, 8:07 pm 

Replies: 17
Views: 17601


1st note: technically the USS St.louis (C-20) is a protected cruiser that later got reclassified as a Heavy Cruiser. a better replacement for light cruisers would be the Chester Class which was a scout cruiser that was later reclassified as a light cruiser or the Denver class cruiser which were orig...

 Forum: Never-Built Designs  Topic: Royal Navy Interwar Captial Ships

 Post subject: Re: Royal Navy Interwar Captial Ships Posted: August 14th, 2017, 1:21 am 

Replies: 214
Views: 260907


looks great, I used to not care for and think the design of the G3/N3 battlecruisers looked really weird, but you know what after a while it's kinda grown on me. anyway great job man, looks awesome

 Forum: Beginners Only  Topic: CA-B WIP

 Post subject: Re: CA-B WIP Posted: August 8th, 2017, 5:09 am 

Replies: 35
Views: 39289


here is the current rendition: http://i.imgur.com/dSgz2yu.png I believe I scaled the top view of the ship correctly, however while working on it a bit i noticed that the image isn't actually symmetrical. unless keeping the planes wing when I highlighted all of it changed the center and messed it up ...

 Forum: Beginners Only  Topic: CA-B WIP

 Post subject: Re: CA-B WIP Posted: July 31st, 2017, 2:41 am 

Replies: 35
Views: 39289


Very nice attempt at CA-B! I hope once you have done this you will do the CA-C and maybe some of the CA2-x series as well ;). Keep up the good work! Thanks, and that's what I was planning on/thinking of doing. Especially once I get the hang of doing this. As of now I am on vacation so I'm not going...

 Forum: Beginners Only  Topic: CA-B WIP

 Post subject: Re: CA-B WIP Posted: July 28th, 2017, 3:04 pm 

Replies: 35
Views: 39289


The overhanging 40mm tub on the stern seems unlikely. The reason many USN cruisers of the period had such a crowded stern is because of their right-aft aircraft handling, which of course does not apply to this design. Something more like the real-life Alaska arrangement seems likely to me. ah ok, I...

 Forum: Parts Sheets Discussion  Topic: USN World War II Components Master Sheet and References

 Post subject: Re: USN World War II Components Master Sheet and References Posted: July 28th, 2017, 2:59 pm 

Replies: 78
Views: 221800


1 will there be a top view list of components?
2 is there any way I can help with anything?

 Forum: Beginners Only  Topic: CA-B WIP

 Post subject: Re: CA-B WIP Posted: July 28th, 2017, 7:12 am 

Replies: 35
Views: 39289


here's what I got: http://i.imgur.com/uoDJACZ.png and here is a version with a trial of the Measure 22 camo. http://i.imgur.com/nGOEEkC.png as for what I did overall: 1st i added another life raft on the back part of the aft-most? secondary turret and placed down another 40mm Bofors mount. 2nd after...

 Forum: FD Scale Drawings  Topic: US ARMY Organization

 Post subject: Re: US ARMY Organization Posted: July 27th, 2017, 6:39 pm 

Replies: 245
Views: 263788


nighthunter wrote: *
Odd, I've always heard them referenced as loaders, even by veterans. But if the TO&E of the US Army of the era called them "Cannoneers" then I submit to the correct term.
Loaders could just be common slang then, I mean Loader is quicker and easier to say then Cannoneer.

 Forum: General Discussion  Topic: MS Paint is Dead!

 Post subject: Re: MS Paint is Dead! Posted: July 27th, 2017, 6:31 pm 

Replies: 13
Views: 14407


Hood wrote: *
I assume Microsoft assumes everyone wants to build 3D printed models these days. Who knows, maybe in 10-15 years time we'll all be making uniform SB models to clutter our homes!
That sounds awesome to be honest.
Display: Sort by: Direction:
Go to advanced search [ Search found 46 matches ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5 »


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Jump to: 

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]