howcome the crediting seems to be so difficould to you guys?
Just the names.
First the one's who has done most of the work and then the rest.
That's what I just said in the first post - don't worry, I'm going to fix it.
Thye shading around the prop guard, catapult, foremast and the staiis amidship is wrong, the gangway and boat boom needs shading, the waterline shouldn't be drawn in black, but rather a dark grey, the motor launch needs a black line that divides the underwater hull from the rest of the hull. Lastly the portholes looks shoddy placed, especially around the bow and stern. Since the internal decks almost always follows the maindeck, I always place the porhole with the same distance from the main deck. And unless the porholes under the b(?) gun are oval, those needs to be redone. And I believe the grey thing next to them is a davit. If that's the case it needs a black outline. The boom on the aft mast could do with some work and I believe the superstructure just aft of the stack could use some aditional shading.
Other than that, very good work.
The portholes are correct, exactly like they are on the original ship. They're placed exactly as they are in my sources (Friedmans) so I'm not going to alter it without pretty decisive evidence. As to the shading on the infrastructure aft of the second funnel - are you referring to the white area? That area's open to the elements; there's no bulkheads there.
I'll look into fixing the other areas you pointed out later today. I think I see where on the mainmast you're talking about. Thanks, that's a help.