Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 3 of 16  [ 153 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4 516 »
Author Message
Colosseum
Post subject: Re: Japan - Fuso Class Battleship.Posted: May 5th, 2014, 6:51 pm
Offline
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Colorado
Contact: Website
Really excellent stuff... I don't know how you have the patience to do this... going through five iterations of BB-55 has really killed me!

_________________
USN components, camouflage colors, & reference links (World War II only)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Syzmo
Post subject: Re: Japan - Fuso Class Battleship.Posted: May 5th, 2014, 6:59 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 285
Joined: August 13th, 2011, 4:03 am
Location: Baltimore MD
Truly masterful, cant wait to see everything.

Anyone know what the reason for designing R turret (to use the British parlance) to have a raised barbette as if it was supposed to be superfiring over Q or X turret?

_________________
"All men dream, but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity, but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible. This I did." Thomas Edward Lawrence, The Seven Pillars of Wisdom


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
BB1987
Post subject: Re: Japan - Fuso Class Battleship.Posted: May 6th, 2014, 10:47 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2816
Joined: May 23rd, 2012, 1:01 pm
Location: Rome - Italy
Colosseum wrote:
Really excellent stuff... I don't know how you have the patience to do this... going through five iterations of BB-55 has really killed me!
I have my moments, IJN Taiho and her never-built variants nearly killed me for example, not mentioning the CV conversion of IJN Ibuki, which I've started over a year ago and I've not managed to complete yet.
Syzmo wrote:
Anyone know what the reason for designing R turret (to use the British parlance) to have a raised barbette as if it was supposed to be superfiring over Q or X turret?
I made a quick check of my sources, but even "Anatomy of the Battleship Fuso" by Janus Skulski does not explain why. Still, the boat handling area was just below and abeam turret 4 (or R).Beign higher the gun could rotate without hitting on being impaired by them, althoug I cannot say that was the only reason.


Anyway.
Searchlights:
[ img ]

_________________
My Worklist
Sources and documentations are the most welcome.

-Koko Kyouwakoku (Republic of Koko)
-Koko's carrier-based aircrafts of WWII
-Koko Kaiun Yuso Kaisha - KoKaYu Line (Koko AU spinoff)
-Koko - Civil Aviation


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
bezobrazov
Post subject: Re: Japan - Fuso Class Battleship.Posted: May 6th, 2014, 1:32 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3406
Joined: July 29th, 2010, 2:20 pm
One obvious reason to raise the "Q"-turret (the correct RN-designation, since there are six turrets: a-b, p-q and x-y) was to avoid damaging blasts from own fire across the beams. This proved to be one of those perennial problems facing really any dreadnought battleship/-cruiser. The higher up the guns were, the lesser risk of blasting your own boats into driftwood!

_________________
My Avatar:Петр Алексеевич Безобразов (Petr Alekseevich Bezobrazov), Вице-адмирал , царская ВМФ России(1845-1906) - I sign my drawings as Ari Saarinen


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
WWII44
Post subject: Re: Japan - Fuso Class Battleship.Posted: May 6th, 2014, 1:53 pm
Offline
Posts: 622
Joined: August 6th, 2011, 4:10 pm
you sir are the master of IJN warships, a true Artist.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
BB1987
Post subject: Re: Japan - Fuso Class Battleship.Posted: May 6th, 2014, 4:16 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2816
Joined: May 23rd, 2012, 1:01 pm
Location: Rome - Italy
So, enough with the teasers, here is IJN Fuso as commissioned in November 1915:
[ img ]

_________________
My Worklist
Sources and documentations are the most welcome.

-Koko Kyouwakoku (Republic of Koko)
-Koko's carrier-based aircrafts of WWII
-Koko Kaiun Yuso Kaisha - KoKaYu Line (Koko AU spinoff)
-Koko - Civil Aviation


Last edited by BB1987 on May 22nd, 2014, 11:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
emperor_andreas
Post subject: Re: Japan - Fuso Class Battleship.Posted: May 6th, 2014, 4:18 pm
Offline
Posts: 3878
Joined: November 17th, 2010, 8:03 am
Location: Corinth, MS USA
Contact: YouTube
She's beautiful! Can't wait for the future entries in this series!

_________________
[ img ]
MS State Guard - 08 March 2014 - 28 January 2023

The Official IJN Ships & Planes List

#FJB


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
KHT
Post subject: Re: Japan - Fuso Class Battleship.Posted: May 6th, 2014, 4:52 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1396
Joined: November 19th, 2011, 12:49 pm
Woah... Beautiful work.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
PomboCZ
Post subject: Re: Japan - Fuso Class Battleship.Posted: May 6th, 2014, 4:57 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 179
Joined: December 29th, 2012, 5:37 pm
Location: Czechia
awesome work! :-)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Japan - Fuso Class Battleship.Posted: May 6th, 2014, 5:01 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7497
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
bezobrazov wrote:
One obvious reason to raise the "Q"-turret (the correct RN-designation, since there are six turrets: a-b, p-q and x-y) was to avoid damaging blasts from own fire across the beams. This proved to be one of those perennial problems facing really any dreadnought battleship/-cruiser. The higher up the guns were, the lesser risk of blasting your own boats into driftwood!
another reason might be (wild guess, but possible) the ship being too stable. moving the CoG slightly up would have benefitted an lower GM, and if you have reserve........ (I believe these days the IMO state that ships GM may only be 0,03* the beam at the waterline)

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 3 of 16  [ 153 posts ]  Return to “Real Designs” | Go to page « 1 2 3 4 516 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 153 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]