Shipbucket http://shipbucket.com/forums/ |
|
Brooklyn class cruisers http://shipbucket.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=8324 |
Page 3 of 5 |
Author: | erik_t [ March 22nd, 2018, 1:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Brooklyn class cruisers |
She is missing a screw, is she not? |
Author: | Charybdis [ March 22nd, 2018, 1:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Brooklyn class cruisers |
Top job. Has the port hole standard changed? |
Author: | Colosseum [ March 22nd, 2018, 2:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Brooklyn class cruisers |
Thanks all.
So Argentina got two Brooklyn class light cruisers? The other one being the U.S.S. Phoenix.
Yes - all the Brooklyn class cruisers that did not receive the "ultimate" wartime refit that added twin 5" mounts and hull blistering were sold to the South American navies: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brooklyn- ... lass_ships I've seen them referred to as the "ABC cruisers" in some publications (Argentina/Brazil/Chile) and they were the centerpiece of a weird and stereotypically Latin arms race in the 1950s and 1960s to arm their navies with obsolete gun cruisers.
She is missing a screw, is she not?
Oops, had some layers unchecked while cutting/pasting into the template.
Top job.
I've started using a 3x3 porthole size as I think it more accurately shows their size in this scale. All the plans I have of the various classes of ships I've drawn recently make note of 12" and 18" portholes - in our scale, only the 18" porthole can be adequately represented, and the original 4x4 portholes we used for many years are just too large. Now that I've given up on trying to keep the old standards alive I've moved away from the cartoony old methods.
Has the port hole standard changed? |
Author: | eswube [ March 25th, 2018, 9:07 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Brooklyn class cruisers |
Excellent! |
Author: | Colosseum [ April 7th, 2018, 1:24 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Brooklyn class cruisers |
This is BOISE (CL-47) in November of 1941 with Measure 1 camouflage while the ship was stationed at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. BOISE shows the results of the King Board refits, with splinter shielding added around her 5"/25-caliber secondary battery gun mounts and .50-caliber machine guns above the bridge. Two 3"/50-caliber guns have also been sited in tubs abeam the aft superstructure. BOISE exhibits the typical pre-war boat complement, serviced by two large cranes amidships. As launched, the Mark 34 directors for the main battery aboard the BROOKLYN class cruisers did not have integral rangefinders (rather just small spotting glasses). BOISE has received the updated Mark 34 director shield which included the rangefinder. The forward Mark 34 director has the first of the Mark 3 "FC" ranging radar sets. The secondary battery guns were controlled by fully-enclosed Mark 33 directors. BOISE would join Task Force 5 of the Asiatic Fleet in this configuration, but a collision with an uncharted shoal on 21 January 1942 forced her retirement to Colombo, Ceylon, and eventually to Mare Island for an overhaul, thus escaping the unfortunate fate awaiting the Allied ships defending Java. |
Author: | emperor_andreas [ April 7th, 2018, 1:36 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Brooklyn class cruisers |
Very nice work! |
Author: | Hood [ April 7th, 2018, 8:36 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Brooklyn class cruisers |
Another fantastic addition. |
Author: | eswube [ April 7th, 2018, 11:36 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Brooklyn class cruisers |
Looking great! |
Author: | Charybdis [ April 7th, 2018, 6:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Brooklyn class cruisers |
Fantastic effort. |
Author: | reytuerto [ April 7th, 2018, 7:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Brooklyn class cruisers |
USS Boise looks impressive in Measure 1! Excellent drawing! |
Page 3 of 5 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |