Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 6 of 8  [ 78 posts ]  Go to page « 14 5 6 7 8 »
Author Message
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Type 26 / GCS: Late 2011 and early 2012Posted: September 19th, 2013, 12:39 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7496
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
I think it more likely that an oto melara model is chosen, as every gun ever shown on the concept were oto 127 or enlarged oto 76 turrets

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Gunship
Post subject: Re: Type 26 / GCS: Late 2011 and early 2012Posted: November 28th, 2013, 9:12 pm
Offline
Posts: 226
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 11:31 pm
Location: Chile
A litle upload

[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Type 26 / GCS: Late 2011 and early 2012Posted: November 28th, 2013, 9:25 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7496
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d6AnXi2N ... .be&t=7m4s

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Type 26 / GCS: Late 2011 and early 2012Posted: November 28th, 2013, 11:33 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9049
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
Nice drawing.



what I am wondering about now is: what if Norway accepted the British frigate design back in the days. how would the Norwegian frigate look like, heck how would the British frigate look like?


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
eswube
Post subject: Re: Type 26 / GCS: Late 2011 and early 2012Posted: November 29th, 2013, 4:49 pm
Offline
Posts: 10635
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am
Nice work indeed.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Type 26 / GCS: Late 2011 and early 2012Posted: November 29th, 2013, 4:51 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7496
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
it doesn't belong in the never build section though, as pointed out in the earlier comments.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: Type 26 / GCS: Late 2011 and early 2012Posted: November 29th, 2013, 5:20 pm
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
Well, until steel is cut, maybe it does? There have been a lot of design revisions, each one reasonably considered a "never-built".


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Type 26 / GCS: Late 2011 and early 2012Posted: November 29th, 2013, 5:29 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7496
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
erik_t wrote:
Well, until steel is cut, maybe it does? There have been a lot of design revisions, each one reasonably considered a "never-built".
true, but for example the main gun is out of production and none of the concepts show anything like it. the fact that it is included in this drawing makes me doubt it all.
if some reference can be shown for the placement and choice of the gun and other systems, and for the shape of the superstructure, I will take back my words on this, but until then, I see this as an own design based on the type 26.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Colombamike
Post subject: Re: Type 26 / GCS: Late 2011 and early 2012Posted: November 29th, 2013, 9:09 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1357
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 6:18 am
Location: France, Marseille
edited


Last edited by Colombamike on December 4th, 2013, 9:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
RP1
Post subject: Re: Type 26 / GCS: Late 2011 and early 2012Posted: December 1st, 2013, 4:02 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 208
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 8:48 pm
Location: Engerlands
Contact: Website
Hello everybody!

OK, there is an issue here that the detail design is changing - a lot - and so each set of renderings or model must be seen as a stand-alone design. For example, the model has the US 127mm whereas the renderings (and most models) have used the Italian weapon. The model has a rounded stern whilst that rendering has a chine. The VLS position, EOFC position, EO/IRST type and position etc keep moving, etc etc etc.

There are a few guidelines that should always be the case (except when they aren't! ;-) ): Planform alignment: Sloped surfaces will be at the same angle whenever possible. Vents and intakes: There is a space behind them for an intake plenum, spray filtering, ATU etc, so those on the superstructure proper will tend to be tucked out of the way - see the funny shaped mission bay door on the rendering.

RP1

_________________
"Yes siree, the excitement never stops." Togusa, Ghost in the Shell


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 6 of 8  [ 78 posts ]  Return to “Never-Built Designs” | Go to page « 14 5 6 7 8 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]