» »

Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 3 of 3  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3
[Print view]
Author Message
klagldsf
Post subject: Re: H Class Super battleship, H44Posted: August 23rd, 2010, 11:00 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm
MitcheLL300 wrote:
I will continue. But two minus grades took me off drawing.
Maybe that's a hint.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: H Class Super battleship, H44Posted: August 24th, 2010, 3:53 am
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
acelanceloet wrote:
please consider the time era this ship sailed in. it was in WO2, where you had only bad aimed dumb bombs, non-guided torpedo's and grenades. and I suppose this ship is armored very well, which makes it a lot less vulnerable.
Perhaps you should let the crew of the Roma know about your stunning historical insight. Or the U-boat crews, or the good folks at China Lake.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Canadai
Post subject: Re: H Class Super battleship, H44Posted: August 24th, 2010, 3:57 am
Offline
Posts: 94
Joined: August 22nd, 2010, 1:11 am
If you're really getting desperate against something like that, an Iowa class at full steam to the side tends to make boats unhappy.

_________________
Atheism. Because Religion Has No Proof.
Canada Rules
~Obligatory Sig Image Here~
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
klagldsf
Post subject: Re: H Class Super battleship, H44Posted: August 24th, 2010, 4:17 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm
Either way, ludicrous or not, it's a real proposal so...I guess we have to leave the kid alone on this one...


...dot dot dot question mark?
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: H Class Super battleship, H44Posted: August 24th, 2010, 5:47 am
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
Canadai wrote:
If you're really getting desperate against something like that, an Iowa class at full steam to the side tends to make boats unhappy.
No need. Tarzon is plenty.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: H Class Super battleship, H44Posted: August 24th, 2010, 8:17 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7497
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
erik_t wrote:
acelanceloet wrote:
please consider the time era this ship sailed in. it was in WO2, where you had only bad aimed dumb bombs, non-guided torpedo's and grenades. and I suppose this ship is armored very well, which makes it a lot less vulnerable.
Perhaps you should let the crew of the Roma know about your stunning historical insight. Or the U-boat crews, or the good folks at China Lake.
ok ok... they hadn't ONLY dumb weapons.... but the majority of the kills in WO2 was made using dumb weapons, if I'm right. the smart ones were only used near the end of the war....... but you are right, I was too fast with my comment ;) I will do some research next time I say something like that.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: H Class Super battleship, H44Posted: August 24th, 2010, 4:20 pm
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
The vast majority of kills were by unguided weapons largely because, by the time guided weapons were ready, there wasn't much left to kill.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 3 of 3  [ 27 posts ]  Return to “Never-Built Designs” | Go to page « 1 2 3

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests

The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]