Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 3 of 3  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3
Author Message
Hood
Post subject: Re: Royal Sovereign Class Never-Were'sPosted: November 8th, 2014, 11:24 am
Offline
Posts: 7164
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 10:07 am
Thanks to Smurf's scans of Sir Eustace Tennyson d'Encourt's notebook, I have revised the W2 design which was planned for HMS Resistance. The superstructure was much larger and despite text descriptions of a larger conning tower, the sketch shows a much smaller one.
Also, given the W2s (Repulse and Renown) were based on the T1 design, I have updated their casemate positions accordingly. These were to have an improved conning tower so I've added the arrangements from W1.

[ img ]
W1

[ img ]
[ img ]
W2

All images on p1 have been updated.

_________________
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
smurf
Post subject: Re: Royal Sovereign Class Never-Were'sPosted: November 8th, 2014, 5:05 pm
Offline
Posts: 207
Joined: October 25th, 2014, 7:46 pm
Another set of excellent drawings.
"despite text descriptions of a larger conning tower, the sketch shows a much smaller one. "
This problem does arise from time to time. When I wrote my article on the Fiji class for Warship, after some exchange of e-mails with the editor, John Jordan, who also did the drawings, we decided to put this footnote on the set for the initial designs:
"These drawings are faithful to the original sketches in ADM 1/9402. The details on them do not correspond exactly to the written descriptions in various Admiralty papers, which are not always entirely consistent with each other. Where some details of armour and location of armament and fittings are omitted from the original drawings, no attempt has been made to 'guess' the likely locations."
In other words, we gave up!
(ETdE's sketch may be a very early one. Figures are a nightmare. If for example you follow any design through from conception to scrapping, you will find a host of different figures for say length or displacement in different books and papers. Some different ones may all be correct when each one was written. Some may refer to different states of the ship (eg overall or waterline lengths, unspecified). Some are just plain wrong.)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Royal Sovereign Class Never-Were'sPosted: November 8th, 2014, 5:15 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9060
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
Hood, Hood, taste on this word: Awesome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Krakatoa
Post subject: Re: Royal Sovereign Class Never-Were'sPosted: November 8th, 2014, 7:50 pm
Offline
Posts: 2504
Joined: July 1st, 2014, 12:20 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact: Website
The Royal Navy is certainly getting some well deserved attention, your drawings of these ships are improving all the time. Well done Hood (and Smurf).


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
eswube
Post subject: Re: Royal Sovereign Class Never-Were'sPosted: November 8th, 2014, 9:19 pm
Offline
Posts: 10648
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am
Fantastic work!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 3 of 3  [ 25 posts ]  Return to “Never-Built Designs” | Go to page « 1 2 3

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 14 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]