Oook! here are some corrections and additions
![[ img ]](http://cdn.imghack.se/images/d3066e9e9686f703df596e862cb6f4e6.png)
| Shipbucket http://shipbucket.com/forums/ |
|
| "NORMANDIE" 2014 http://shipbucket.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=5072 |
Page 2 of 3 |
| Author: | erik_t [ March 27th, 2014, 9:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "NORMANDIE" 2014 |
Very attractive, aside from that ghastly stern (which is the right one to use, I just find it ugly). |
|
| Author: | TimothyC [ March 27th, 2014, 9:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "NORMANDIE" 2014 |
One thing I just noticed is the lack of hull/superstructure doors for passenger and light cargo movements. |
|
| Author: | klagldsf [ March 27th, 2014, 9:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "NORMANDIE" 2014 |
In all honestly it looks incredibly bland...but, alas, it only means it's all too realistic. At least it avoids the main problem of the "France-II", that is being designed while seriously high. |
|
| Author: | Navarchos [ March 27th, 2014, 11:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "NORMANDIE" 2014 |
Oook! here are some corrections and additions
|
|
| Author: | TimothyC [ March 28th, 2014, 3:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "NORMANDIE" 2014 |
Might I offer the suggestion of looking at the way the doors were placed on QM2? You want at least one wide set of doors for passengers to embark/disembark at port (no need for the system you have near the stern, any ramps will be stored internally). I'd make the ones on the lower of the two decks smaller and the ones on the upper of the two decks larger. I'd also get rid of the shading around them - they are going to be flush and sealed when underway. I also figured out what was bugging me about the forward pods. I'd move them up a few pixels so they are on the large gently slopping part of the hull. All in all these are minor things, and I'll be stealing this drawing (with full credit) for future use  .
|
|
| Author: | Navarchos [ March 28th, 2014, 7:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "NORMANDIE" 2014 |
Some more additions/small changes and more details! ![[ img ]](http://cdn.imghack.se/images/987da984e72ab76b8d8c01a51ddf8606.png)
|
|
| Author: | bezobrazov [ March 28th, 2014, 7:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "NORMANDIE" 2014 |
Would there be a chance to see how a more "Normandie-like" bridge would look like on this one? Somehow that bridge, although functional and so, is very bland compared to the original. Just asking, is all... |
|
| Author: | Navarchos [ March 28th, 2014, 7:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "NORMANDIE" 2014 |
So here is a bridge more like the old Normanie one...I don't like it! ![[ img ]](http://cdn.imghack.se/images/135b8e25b115c6bebe65fe5e83062276.png)
|
|
| Author: | bezobrazov [ March 28th, 2014, 8:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "NORMANDIE" 2014 |
*LOL* Whatever you do, please do NOT delete that picture. I, as a matter of fact, like it very much! But you're the artist, so I understand if you decide not to use it. Just leave it for me though! |
|
| Author: | Navarchos [ March 28th, 2014, 8:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "NORMANDIE" 2014 |
...and something like this... ![[ img ]](http://cdn.imghack.se/images/9e65b7d195dabd230d960a7206e4930f.png)
|
|
| Page 2 of 3 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|