Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 4 of 10  [ 93 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5 610 »
Author Message
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Destroyer/frigatePosted: January 10th, 2011, 12:09 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9080
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
Attachment:
TBN 005.png


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
klagldsf
Post subject: Re: Destroyer/frigatePosted: January 10th, 2011, 12:12 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm
The idea of a ship being "constructed" in such an elaborate manner is...extremely intriguing, and shows a lot of forward thinking in terms of "engineering" a ship from a Shipbucket drawing.

That said, a few thoughts:

1.) I like the first version better with the mast - that said, aside from looking even more like a brain tumor than the setup of Fridwhatever Norweiganship, it looks incredibly unstable. Why not just redraw that?

2.) I feel having two OTO 76s placed the way you have them makes it rather redundant. The ROF of that gun means that you only need one per arc to engage sea and air/seaskimming targets.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Destroyer/frigatePosted: January 10th, 2011, 12:20 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9080
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
klagldsf wrote:
The idea of a ship being "constructed" in such an elaborate manner is...extremely intriguing, and shows a lot of forward thinking in terms of "engineering" a ship from a Shipbucket drawing.
:geek:
klagldsf wrote:
1.) I like the first version better with the mast - that said, aside from looking even more like a brain tumor than the setup of Fridwhatever Norweiganship, it looks incredibly unstable. Why not just redraw that?
shall make a second version. but thanks for the name idea! HNoMS "BRAIN TUMOR" :D
klagldsf wrote:
2.) I feel having two OTO 76s placed the way you have them makes it rather redundant. The ROF of that gun means that you only need one per arc to engage sea and air/seaskimming targets.
"installing cat!" Yes fully agree with that.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Destroyer/frigate/cruiserPosted: January 10th, 2011, 2:35 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9080
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
Attachment:
TBN 005.png


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Destroyer/frigatePosted: January 10th, 2011, 3:43 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7501
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
looks better now. I would like to see some more directors though (maybe next to each other) and also, what are you planning with the dock? the way you have your weapons on the stern now, will take all space where your dock should be.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Destroyer/frigatePosted: January 10th, 2011, 4:47 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9080
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
acelanceloet wrote:
looks better now. I would like to see some more directors though (maybe next to each other) and also, what are you planning with the dock? the way you have your weapons on the stern now, will take all space where your dock should be.
The dock will come in the second version of the ship.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
klagldsf
Post subject: Re: Destroyer/frigatePosted: January 10th, 2011, 6:47 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm
heuhen wrote:
klagldsf wrote:
The idea of a ship being "constructed" in such an elaborate manner is...extremely intriguing, and shows a lot of forward thinking in terms of "engineering" a ship from a Shipbucket drawing.
:geek:
Yeah, it's the most well-designed ship you've shown so far and the first one to show real thought in design. Though I would make a flush stern at this point, it will also give you more space for your well dock.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Destroyer/frigatePosted: January 10th, 2011, 8:12 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Your current rudder arrangement won't allow a floodable dock.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: Destroyer/frigatePosted: January 10th, 2011, 11:41 pm
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
Even if you're diesel, you have way way too little stack and uptake. And the phased array faces should absolutely be at 45deg to the centerline.
Thiel wrote:
Your current rudder arrangement won't allow a floodable dock.
Neither will the 76/62 or VLS. I assume at this point that he's got a narrow RHIB bay on either side, which might work.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
klagldsf
Post subject: Re: Destroyer/frigatePosted: January 11th, 2011, 7:52 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm
Oh, and yes, your funnel arrangement is weird beyond reasonable comprehension.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 4 of 10  [ 93 posts ]  Return to “Personal Designs” | Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5 610 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]