Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 1 of 3  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 3 »
Author Message
youboat
Post subject: Escort cruiser'sPosted: January 10th, 2014, 9:32 pm
Offline
Posts: 99
Joined: July 19th, 2012, 5:20 am
Hi guys
Some variations on a theme. I tried to use new weapons. Being escorts i expected they would operate in small numbers or singly so must have some means of defending against all threats. I nicked sebu's masts instead of hull mounted aegis types and rotating arrays.

[ img ]

[ img ]

[ img ]

Fred

_________________
In the works CURRENT
WW1 RN Chatham, Emerald
R, Mod R, K, Beagle, Acorn class DD's


Last edited by youboat on January 14th, 2014, 2:47 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Escort cruiser'sPosted: January 10th, 2014, 9:33 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7497
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
I suspect some stability issues here ;)

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Blackbuck
Post subject: Re: Escort cruiser'sPosted: January 10th, 2014, 10:39 pm
Offline
Posts: 2741
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom
Much scepticism has been arisen.

_________________
AU Projects: | Federal Monarchy of Tír Glas| Other Ivernic Nations | Artemis Group |
Blood and Fire


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
youboat
Post subject: Re: Escort cruiser'sPosted: January 11th, 2014, 5:10 am
Offline
Posts: 99
Joined: July 19th, 2012, 5:20 am
Deeper hull maybe?

Fred

_________________
In the works CURRENT
WW1 RN Chatham, Emerald
R, Mod R, K, Beagle, Acorn class DD's


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Escort cruiser'sPosted: January 11th, 2014, 9:43 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7497
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
no. the main problem is the size of your missile systems, and the fact that the ASM's are placed on top of the main deck, instead of below them.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Blackbuck
Post subject: Re: Escort cruiser'sPosted: January 11th, 2014, 10:39 am
Offline
Posts: 2741
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom
Added to which twin arm launchers are vastly outdated on something as LO concerned as these.

A little background of the where they're from and how far out they have to do their duties would help in pinning down some particulars IMO. For instance my Deity class command/escort cruisers are simply re-tasked destroyers with extra CIC and flag facilities. They're expected to either operate as flotilla leaders or singularly in the anti narco/piracy role for months at a time and they're considerably smaller than the three drawings you've presented. I think if you went to a vertical launch arrangement and looked at AShMs that aren't the size of a jumbo jet you could be onto something much better.
If it helps I did a re-draw of my fictitious VLS system not long ago. Might give you some ideas for size etc. Feel free to use the actual stuff too if you wish.

[ img ]

_________________
AU Projects: | Federal Monarchy of Tír Glas| Other Ivernic Nations | Artemis Group |
Blood and Fire


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
youboat
Post subject: Re: Escort cruiser'sPosted: January 12th, 2014, 7:13 am
Offline
Posts: 99
Joined: July 19th, 2012, 5:20 am
They are from a new AU. The intention is to escort to far flung trade partners, all weapons shipments are to be escorted. No smaller units are expected to engaged in escorting. I used launchers due to the length of the ER AAM's (and to avoid boring VL flats). All AAMs's are active seeker, hence no illuminators. The idea was a common hull, and magazine space.

_________________
In the works CURRENT
WW1 RN Chatham, Emerald
R, Mod R, K, Beagle, Acorn class DD's


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Escort cruiser'sPosted: January 12th, 2014, 9:49 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7497
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
the deck penetration required by an launcher and an VLS are about the same (check the Mk 26 and the Mk 41 in comparision). storing horizontal is possible of course, but limits the amount of missiles you can take.
your escort ships all have missiles the size of soviet anti-carrier missiles and larger?

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
youboat
Post subject: Re: Escort cruiser'sPosted: January 14th, 2014, 2:46 am
Offline
Posts: 99
Joined: July 19th, 2012, 5:20 am
Bit more strike than escort.

Rehash
[ img ]


Added
[ img ]

_________________
In the works CURRENT
WW1 RN Chatham, Emerald
R, Mod R, K, Beagle, Acorn class DD's


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
youboat
Post subject: Re: Escort cruiser'sPosted: April 1st, 2014, 8:11 am
Offline
Posts: 99
Joined: July 19th, 2012, 5:20 am
Back to guns
[ img ]

4 twin 6"/70 smooth bores firing proximity, homing and guided shells. The mounts have the dual feed reduced to single feed only with several ready rounds each per gun. Secondary is 4 twin 3"/60 and tertiary 4 twin 30mm.

Fred

_________________
In the works CURRENT
WW1 RN Chatham, Emerald
R, Mod R, K, Beagle, Acorn class DD's


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 1 of 3  [ 22 posts ]  Return to “Personal Designs” | Go to page 1 2 3 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]