Early Cold War Destroyer challenge
Moderator: Community Manager
- Garlicdesign
- Posts: 1071
- Joined: December 26th, 2012, 9:36 am
- Location: Germany
Re: Early Cold War Destroyer challenge
Hello everyone!
Congrats BB1987 for a deserved win! You really keep winning these contests!
What's the next one??
Greetings
GD
Congrats BB1987 for a deserved win! You really keep winning these contests!
What's the next one??
Greetings
GD
Re: Early Cold War Destroyer challenge
Congratulations to all who took part.
This was an interesting challenge and certainly resulted in a range of very interesting designs.
This was an interesting challenge and certainly resulted in a range of very interesting designs.
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft
-
- Posts: 4712
- Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:10 am
- Location: Finland
- Contact:
Re: Early Cold War Destroyer challenge
congrats to the winner. This was really great challenge and fun to participate in
Re: Early Cold War Destroyer challenge
I cannot say I'm not feeling honoured by winning this contest as well, but I have to be completely honest, this win took me by complete suprise. I thought and I still think that there are almost half-a dozen works (Garlic, Grumpykestrel, Charguizard, Rodondo and wb21) that are definitely more worth than mine. I played safe after all.
My Worklist
Sources and documentations are the most welcome.
-Koko Kyouwakoku (Republic of Koko)
-Koko's carrier-based aircrafts of WWII
-Koko Kaiun Yuso Kaisha - KoKaYu Line (Koko AU spinoff)
-Koko - Civil Aviation
Sources and documentations are the most welcome.
-Koko Kyouwakoku (Republic of Koko)
-Koko's carrier-based aircrafts of WWII
-Koko Kaiun Yuso Kaisha - KoKaYu Line (Koko AU spinoff)
-Koko - Civil Aviation
Re: Early Cold War Destroyer challenge
When "realism/feasibility" is an explicit scoring category, playing it safe might be boring but it's a smart strategy
Re: Early Cold War Destroyer challenge
Congratulations to BB1987, on his first place, as it was an interesting contest, with a lot of very good, and good looking drawings and ships.
I'm pleased to have taken a part, as warships are now mostly a thing of the past (evident by my merchant ships drawing, and almost no participation in any warship designs thread), but this contest was for me a chance to test the helicopter destroyer idea (not an original one, mind you), and hence my contribution.
So, well done BB1987, and thank you to all who submitted and of course not to forget the judges.
I'm pleased to have taken a part, as warships are now mostly a thing of the past (evident by my merchant ships drawing, and almost no participation in any warship designs thread), but this contest was for me a chance to test the helicopter destroyer idea (not an original one, mind you), and hence my contribution.
So, well done BB1987, and thank you to all who submitted and of course not to forget the judges.
Thank you Kim for the crest
"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"
"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"
Re: Early Cold War Destroyer challenge
Congratulations to BB1987!
That was an extremely interesting contest with lots of great entries.
That was an extremely interesting contest with lots of great entries.
Re: Early Cold War Destroyer challenge
I got the vibe of a modern day civilian ship, rather than a warship. The color doesn't suite its role imhoYasutomi wrote: ↑September 19th, 2018, 8:35 am Congratulations to BB1987 and the other entrants and many thanks to the judges for the feedback. Speaking of which...I wonder if I could trouble the latter with a few questions, in an effort to improve my efforts.
1. It seems I've been working to an outdated style. Portholes are now 1-3-1 rather than the old 2-4-4-2, correct? And are there any other major stylistic issues I fell foul of?
2. Shigure: you disliked my green hull...was it the concept, or the shade I used?
Sorry to be bugging you guys for more, but understanding where I'm going wrong is really useful to me!
-
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: October 16th, 2010, 11:06 pm
- Location: In orbit, watching you draw.
- Contact:
Re: Early Cold War Destroyer challenge
Congrats BB, it was an awesome piece of work.
Looking things over, I think Rodondo's Lancaster could easily have been made slightly more practical if he'd used the fuckhueg Sea Slug magazine as a basis for his hangar. It would have entailed lowering the landing pad one level, but it would have freed up a lot of space.
As it is there's a HUGE landing pad for two small helos.
Looking things over, I think Rodondo's Lancaster could easily have been made slightly more practical if he'd used the fuckhueg Sea Slug magazine as a basis for his hangar. It would have entailed lowering the landing pad one level, but it would have freed up a lot of space.
As it is there's a HUGE landing pad for two small helos.
Last edited by MihoshiK on September 22nd, 2018, 7:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
Would you please not eat my gun...
Re: Early Cold War Destroyer challenge
Congratulations BB1987, a very well deserved win! And congratulations to all contributors - this has been a fascinating challenge to watch the variety of excellent designs submitted.