Shipbucket

I was silly, tried to piss off Golly by destroying russian stuff. And then Alvama came with an idea.

Gollevainen: I dont care if you do this
Me: Ah crap, i quit it then, failed attempt!
Alvama: Hey is this EOTN again?
Me: Oh hell, i will do that one again


PSS its long before finished.(Also the aircraft lay out, still need some transport heli's)
And PSS, no its not a joke. Or is it?
The winner wins a joke!

Have a great laugh.(Yes my brains are still in norway...)

Mitch

_________________
Fryssian AU with Lt.Maverick 114
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=9802&p=193331#p193331

Embarked on: HNLMS Karel Doorman A833
To do list:
-Zeven Provincien class cruiser
-Joint support ship all sides
-F124 Sachsen class frigate
-F125 Baden-Württemberg class frigate
-Clemencau class aircraft carrier
-Zeven provincien class frigate
-Poolster class AOR
-Amsterdam class AOR
-Minas Gerais aircraft carrier

...how brutally do you want me to nitpick this?

Because I have a few suggestions:

1.) Bridge the superstructures together. You have nuclear machinery which means you don't need to accommodate stacks. Doing it this way means you consolidate superstructure and now you can just remove flat deck space to get to the nuclear machinery rather than cut through a few extra decks of superstructure.

Or to illustrate this:

------------xxxxx-----xxxxx-------
------------xxxxxyyyyxxxxxx-------
oooooooooooooooyyyyooooooooooo
oooooooooooooooyyyyooooooooooo
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

where x represents superstructure, y represents either nuclear machinery or the space that lies above it, o represents hull and - is just filler to make sure everything aligns properly. Everything that is marked as "y" is something that needs to be removed for refueling.

My suggestion is this:

------------------xxxxx----------
------------------xxxxx----------
ooooooooooyyyyyoooooooooooooo
ooooooooooyyyyyoooooooooooooo
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

2.) Forward Sparrow placement couldn't be any lousier. Switch it with ASROC. Also the fore CIWS needs better placement too.

3.) The superstructure the Mk 26s are on might stand to be bigger to better accomodate loading equipment.

4.) ABLs might be better served fore-aft arrangement; they take up less overall deck space as far as aircraft are concerned.

5.) The lack of detail of the superstructure clashes with the rest of the ship (doing #1 will help in this regard too)