[Post Reply] [*]  Page 115 of 118  [ 1171 posts ]  Go to page « 1113 114 115 116 117 118 »
Author Message
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: March 3rd, 2018, 1:14 pm
Online
User avatar
Posts: 3707
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
1980s and 1990s Super jumbos I've cleaned up:
[ img ]

The 763-246C was a single deck New Large Airplane design from Boeing, and was just inside the 80m wide airport limit for wingspan.

The MD-12 was McDonnell Douglas's attempted 744 competitor, but issues with the MD-11 meant that it never got off of paper.

An-418 was a passenger version of hte An-124, but as changes were made to accommodate people rather than cargo, the differences started to multiply.

KR-860 was a Suhkoi design from the end of the 1990s, and would have been the largest aircraft in the world had it been built. To fit in the standard 80m airport width, the wings folded up outboard of the outer engine pylons.

_________________
Please don't call me Tim. If you don't want to use Timothy, use TJ.
MATHNET - To Cogitate and to Solve


Last edited by TimothyC on March 23rd, 2018, 2:37 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Cascadia
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: March 3rd, 2018, 2:08 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 495
Joined: September 1st, 2010, 12:05 pm
Location: Germany
Nice drawings.

Short question about the KR-860 being the largest aircraft in the world had it been built. What is its size compared to the A380.

_________________
My deviantart account
http://cascadiasb.deviantart.com/?rnrd=191663


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
BB1987
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: March 3rd, 2018, 2:45 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2538
Joined: May 23rd, 2012, 1:01 pm
Location: Rome - Italy
TJ, just one question abut the 763. Was it really to be that long and thin?
The only paper reference I have ever managed to find calls for a shorter (547pixels in FD scale) aircraft with a thicker fuselage.
[ img ]

_________________
My Worklist
Sources and documentations are the most welcome.

-Koko Kyouwakoku (Republic of Koko)
-Koko Kaiun Yuso Kaisha - KoKaYu Line (Koko AU spinoff)
-Koko - Civil Aviation


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: March 3rd, 2018, 8:28 pm
Online
User avatar
Posts: 3707
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
BB1987 wrote: *
TJ, just one question abut the 763. Was it really to be that long and thin?
The only paper reference I have ever managed to find calls for a shorter (547pixels in FD scale) aircraft with a thicker fuselage.
[ img ]

You are correct - I'll be redoing it. I had simply coppied the one off of dA, thinking it was correct.

_________________
Please don't call me Tim. If you don't want to use Timothy, use TJ.
MATHNET - To Cogitate and to Solve


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Colosseum
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: March 5th, 2018, 3:38 pm
Offline
Posts: 4887
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact: Website
Let's start using the Wiki to upload Planebucket drawings - pls categorize as "Category:Fixed wing aircraft" or "Category:Helicopters" where necessary. Thanks in advance.

http://shipbucket.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Upload

_________________
USN components, camouflage colors, & reference links (World War II only)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: March 9th, 2018, 9:53 pm
Offline
Posts: 2580
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
Question - has anybody attempted to tackle the Stratolaunch carrier aircraft, at any scale?


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
trexslee
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: March 12th, 2018, 11:04 pm
Offline
Posts: 69
Joined: September 12th, 2017, 10:55 pm
Hey TimothyC, have you heard about the 747-700X? If not, click on this:https://i.pinimg.com/originals/71/3f/68 ... 88a0fc.jpg


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: March 23rd, 2018, 2:38 am
Online
User avatar
Posts: 3707
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
BB1987 wrote: *
TJ, just one question abut the 763. Was it really to be that long and thin?
Forgot to say anything when I did, but the drawing has been updated.
trexslee wrote: *
Hey TimothyC, have you heard about the 747-700X? If not, click on this: https://i.pinimg.com/originals/71/3f/68 ... 88a0fc.jpg
Heard about? Yes. Plan to do? Not really.

_________________
Please don't call me Tim. If you don't want to use Timothy, use TJ.
MATHNET - To Cogitate and to Solve


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
trexslee
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: March 25th, 2018, 5:25 pm
Offline
Posts: 69
Joined: September 12th, 2017, 10:55 pm
TimothyC wrote: *
BB1987 wrote: *
TJ, just one question abut the 763. Was it really to be that long and thin?
Forgot to say anything when I did, but the drawing has been updated.
trexslee wrote: *
Hey TimothyC, have you heard about the 747-700X? If not, click on this: https://i.pinimg.com/originals/71/3f/68 ... 88a0fc.jpg
Heard about? Yes. Plan to do? Not really.
Why not?


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
trexslee
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: March 25th, 2018, 5:26 pm
Offline
Posts: 69
Joined: September 12th, 2017, 10:55 pm
trexslee wrote: *
TimothyC wrote: *
BB1987 wrote: *
TJ, just one question abut the 763. Was it really to be that long and thin?
Forgot to say anything when I did, but the drawing has been updated.
trexslee wrote: *
Hey TimothyC, have you heard about the 747-700X? If not, click on this: https://i.pinimg.com/originals/71/3f/68 ... 88a0fc.jpg
Heard about? Yes. Plan to do? Not really.
Any reason why?


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 115 of 118  [ 1171 posts ]  Return to “Parts Sheets Discussion” | Go to page « 1113 114 115 116 117 118 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


Contact us | The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]