[Post Reply] [*]  Page 30 of 34  [ 337 posts ]  Go to page « 128 29 30 31 3234 »
Author Message
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: belowdeck partsPosted: May 25th, 2014, 7:12 pm
Online
User avatar
Posts: 6997
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
Ah, there is An 6 there which I read as an zero, but still 6 pixels too big?

_________________
[ img ]
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
MihoshiK
Post subject: Re: belowdeck partsPosted: May 25th, 2014, 7:22 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 866
Joined: October 16th, 2010, 11:06 pm
Location: In orbit, watching you draw.
Contact: Website
acelanceloet wrote:
Ah, there is An 6 there which I read as an zero, but still 6 pixels too big?
I dunno, if I scale that drawing to 30 pixels high, the total width ends up as... 70 pixels.

Frankly I went over that cannon, and so did Mitch, and as much as I am glad he's gone, at the end of the day neither of us could find much to improve on it, and we scaled mostly off photographs. I think that drawing is fuxxored.

_________________
Would you please not eat my gun...
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: belowdeck partsPosted: May 25th, 2014, 7:23 pm
Online
User avatar
Posts: 6997
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
what I mean is, this might be the ultimate proof that that reference is wrong (of the same sources) for the LW turret.

_________________
[ img ]
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
MihoshiK
Post subject: Re: belowdeck partsPosted: May 25th, 2014, 7:51 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 866
Joined: October 16th, 2010, 11:06 pm
Location: In orbit, watching you draw.
Contact: Website
acelanceloet wrote:
what I mean is, this might be the ultimate proof that that reference is wrong (of the same sources) for the LW turret.
Well, it probably is.

I mean, I got real fortunate in finding excellent photographs of Bergamini to scale the turret to. Otherwise I would probably have scaled it too small, considering the "prototype" pictures.

Check this out: Forward view from Bergamini:

[ img ]

Bergamini with new turret:

[ img ]

Turret height compared to the bridge windows is just about spot-on.

_________________
Would you please not eat my gun...
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
sebu
Post subject: Re: belowdeck partsPosted: May 25th, 2014, 8:49 pm
Offline
Posts: 466
Joined: August 18th, 2010, 9:18 am
I appreciate your work to get things right; that's for sure. But how on earth you are agreeing with a pixel which is 150mm in real world??


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: belowdeck partsPosted: May 25th, 2014, 10:02 pm
Online
User avatar
Posts: 6997
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
sebu wrote:
I appreciate your work to get things right; that's for sure. But how on earth you are agreeing with a pixel which is 150mm in real world??
what are you talking about?

_________________
[ img ]
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
BB1987
Post subject: Re: belowdeck partsPosted: May 26th, 2014, 5:57 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2355
Joined: May 23rd, 2012, 1:01 pm
Location: Rome - Italy
5"/54 Mk.39 with belowdeck added:
[ img ]

_________________
My Worklist
Sources and documentations are the most welcome.

-Koko Kyouwakoku (Republic of Koko)
-Koko Kaiun Yuso Kaisha - KoKaYu Line (Koko AU spinoff)
-Koko - Civil Aviation


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: belowdeck partsPosted: May 26th, 2014, 6:31 pm
Online
User avatar
Posts: 6997
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
awesome. I'll add it the next time I update the first post (remind me if I change the first post without adding this in)

_________________
[ img ]
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Shipright
Post subject: Re: belowdeck partsPosted: June 3rd, 2014, 3:48 pm
Offline
Posts: 388
Joined: February 15th, 2013, 2:16 pm
[ img ]

Allison AG9140 produced by Rolls Royce. This is the generator used on the DDG51 class amoungst others.

Source:
http://www.rolls-royce.com/Images/MMS%2 ... 2-9324.pdf


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: belowdeck partsPosted: June 3rd, 2014, 3:56 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7827
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
Shipright, it's better to write Arleigh Burk class than DDG51 class. specially for those that doesn't follow on the US Navy, like me (I think yeah they are big and have big arsenal, but how big is the bang for the buck!?!), or for those people that don't know, but are not bothered to use Google...


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 30 of 34  [ 337 posts ]  Return to “Parts Sheets Discussion” | Go to page « 128 29 30 31 3234 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


Contact us | The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited