Here is my second update. I moved the superstructure 530px from the bow, added the side elevator.
The main elevator is at the stern now, I added the funnels, finished 3 aircraft and I think it looks better now (the concept).
![[ img ]](http://i737.photobucket.com/albums/xx15/EZGO394/Senator2.jpg)
| Shipbucket http://shipbucket.com/forums/ |
|
| IoT (Isle of Texas) http://shipbucket.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=28 |
Page 16 of 18 |
| Author: | ezgo394 [ October 22nd, 2010, 10:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: IoT (Isle of Texas) |
Here is my second update. I moved the superstructure 530px from the bow, added the side elevator. The main elevator is at the stern now, I added the funnels, finished 3 aircraft and I think it looks better now (the concept).
|
|
| Author: | ALVAMA [ October 23rd, 2010, 8:45 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: IoT (Isle of Texas) |
It's getting beter  You have saved it wrong btw. |
|
| Author: | ezgo394 [ October 23rd, 2010, 12:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: IoT (Isle of Texas) |
Its photobucket. I dont know how to change it. |
|
| Author: | ezgo394 [ October 24th, 2010, 3:17 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: IoT (Isle of Texas) |
Ok, Im still deciding what catapult system to use. Novice, the deck will NOT be floodable. Im trying to add some visual effects to it, but I dont know what I need to add. (I know im needing the anchor). ![[ img ]](http://i737.photobucket.com/albums/xx15/EZGO394/Senator3.jpg) The ship will be equipped for certain missions. Generally, it is a mix of the Battle group air wing, and the Marines Amphibious and Air Assault force, but can be adapted for one or the other. |
|
| Author: | Novice [ October 24th, 2010, 7:13 am ] | |
| Post subject: | Re: IoT (Isle of Texas) | |
Im trying to add some visual effects to it, but I dont know what I need to add. (I know im needing the anchor).
First you should add a mast for electronics, as it is your ship is blind.look also at other carriers to look for what part are there (it would be extremely usefull if you know what all the are, and their function), as the sides of your carrier are bare-naked as it were. Also take a look at your proprllers and rudder as they seem too small for a ship of that size. |
||
| Author: | acelanceloet [ October 24th, 2010, 12:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: IoT (Isle of Texas) |
maybe this will help.... the help I got when designing my carrier. although they are different in design, it may help you out on some points. http://z11.invisionfree.com/shipbucket/ ... =2734&st=0 |
|
| Author: | ezgo394 [ October 24th, 2010, 3:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: IoT (Isle of Texas) |
Well, since I dont know much about Radars and the like, I was just thinking copy them from my Fort Worth Class CVN (which, in turn, was copied from the nimitz). Would that work, or would it be too powerful/large/overwhelming for this carrier? |
|
| Author: | ezgo394 [ November 5th, 2010, 2:52 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: IoT (Isle of Texas) |
Would it make sense to have a Miesweeper that is also a minelayer? |
|
| Author: | Novice [ November 5th, 2010, 5:53 am ] | |
| Post subject: | Re: IoT (Isle of Texas) | |
Would it make sense to have a Miesweeper that is also a minelayer?
In the past many mineseepers had also the ability to lay mines. HMS Abdiel (1973) was in fact a training minelayer, used to train minesweepers , and so was used to lay mines.I believe the RDN also used its sweepers to lay mines. |
||
| Author: | Portsmouth Bill [ November 5th, 2010, 9:12 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: IoT (Isle of Texas) |
You also have a very shallow draft on that design; so with the top weight it would be inherently unstable; but on the plus side you can get up rivers 
|
|
| Page 16 of 18 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|