Shipbucket

the spg-62, IIRC. the one you currently have already on it, (the one next to your funnel) but you'll need more of them. I would like to see 3-4.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin

how about these



I like the MK 3 version more

as for spy 3 please explain what i would require to redesign my ship

different topic is there a way i can upload via photobucket without having to change the file name

the mk3 still has it's huge amount of directors, but other then that it is nice. I also don't think you should put the APAR on this ship, as most of your systems are US based (and the fact that it doesn't looks really good) I was just giving an example for that.
and for the SPY-3: the spy3 has an 120 degrees coverage, instead of the 90 of the SPY-1. that means you need 3 of them instead of 4. also, it works toghether with the VSR, IIRC, which is another large plate you would have to add to your structure.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin

There is a tutorial on site here

_________________
Thank you Kim for the crest

"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"

Thank you so much for your guidance. I have adjusted the directors some

here is a spy 3 version of the carrier and cruiser, please critique

please note that the SPY-3 is very heavy, so it might make your ship top heavy.... better would be to incorporate it in the superstructure, hence why I said you would have to redesign it.

besides, where did you get the sizes of the arrays from? I haven't checked them, they might as well be correct, so ignore this if you have a good source for that.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin

Couple of observations, you have a STOL ramp which I presume has no cat on it which means unless you've got an angled deck with one on your Hornets will just fall into the sea. Second if you're going for a mix of the two F-35C makes more sense than the B.

Also you could rationalize between the V-22 and AW101 they can both do the same jobs.

As for the ship. That bulbous bow looks huge, the hull looks quite angular too (could just be how I'm looking at it)

Regards, Mark.

_________________
AU Projects: | Federal Monarchy of Tír Glas| Other Ivernic Nations | Artemis Group |
Blood and Fire

I'll review my spy 3 placement, i downloaded it of the shipbucket archives in a file called radar.png. And I also looked at the CVN 78 file.

as for the ramp, i have been looking at changing that.

V22 & AW101 - The V22 would give me longer range and endurance.

I also have wanted to adjust the bow too.

Thanks

here is my updated with your comments incorporated

CV 630 FLEET CARRIER SPY-3