Shipbucket

it does not.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin

A ram is for sinking wooden warships. I have no idea why you would even think of ramming a ship into a million ton block of ice, because that would do absolutely nothing but tear your ram off and crumple the bow, and considering the size of your yacht, it would suffer too much damage to stay afloat. And it is truly best to avoid the North Atlantic in the spring, as well as take proper action by listening to iceberg warnings and keeping a lookout on a crow's nest, equipped with binoculars.

I find the idea of using a yacht to clear icebergs completely idiotic, hell it is completely thoughtless to even think of using any ship to clear icebergs. And don't even try to use icebreakers as an excuse for your idea, an icebreaker is built to clear a path through ice fields for other ships to sail through, and they do not ram ice either, they use a specially designed bow to ride up on the ice and crush through it using the weight of the hull.

And do not even for a minute think of making your yacht into an icebreaker either.

_________________
Current Worklist: http://www.shipbucket.com/forums/viewto ... f=5&t=5562

Ok, ok I will get rid of the ram.

No you need to start from scratch.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆

Why should I start from scratch? Other than the reasons already posted.

That would mean I will have to spend a few hours of work that I don't have at the moment.

Why? Because none of it looks anything like a yacht, there are many flaws in functionality, you might as well retry it and this time base it on real yachts, like Hitler's yacht that some have linked you to.

_________________
Current Worklist: http://www.shipbucket.com/forums/viewto ... f=5&t=5562

So if I want it to look like the way I want it to it is not allowed?

Because it would take longer to fix this thing* than it would to start over.

*'Thing' was what I settled on after 3 other more explicit words were rejected. It's the nicest one I care to use.
Then don't ask for help if you have no intention of following said help!

We're not going to fawn over you for making stupid ships. And yes, your ships are stupid and show a lack of understanding about naval design, and you have shown a lack of interest in improving.

If you want to keep drawing what you have been drawing then do so, but do not expect any help at all.

Do you understand?

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆

Yes I do understand.

And why would it take longer to fix her than start for scratch?

Because to fix it would require redrawing every single element of the ship.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆