Shipbucket
http://shipbucket.com/forums/

FFLX/FFGX
http://shipbucket.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=4056
Page 12 of 12

Author:  erik_t [ March 27th, 2014, 9:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: FFLX/FFGX

Colosseum wrote:
Don't ships do that anyway? Sprint ahead, stop, listen, sprint ahead...?
To some extent, yes, but they are able to keep their sonar systems deployed. There's a pretty substantial time overhead associated with constantly hauling in and dropping out a dipping sonar.

Author:  Lebroba [ March 28th, 2014, 1:22 am ]
Post subject:  Re: FFLX/FFGX

The U.S. Navy was planning on using the AN/AQS-22 dipping SONAR on a RIB for LCS. It doesnt have to remain still, the algorithims for ownship doppler nullification have existed for decades.

I mentioned AQS-22 because its already in the supply system for U.S. Navy, and it's COTS processing and other system compatibility make it attractive alternative. On a ship it would probably be called the AN/SQS-22 Variable Depth SONAR (VDS).

Linear arrays cannot distinguish signals on the left from those on the right, also kown as bearing ambiguity. A reason why it isnt widely used in the U.S. Navy.

Either way, VDS are out there and would be a good alternative to a hull mounted array.

Author:  Colosseum [ March 28th, 2014, 1:42 am ]
Post subject:  Re: FFLX/FFGX

I'm inclined to listen to the guy who does it for a living vs. the armchair experts of this forum...

Author:  Charwhick [ March 28th, 2014, 4:15 am ]
Post subject:  Re: FFLX/FFGX

Happy 3000th post Colo

Page 12 of 12 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
https://www.phpbb.com/