Shipbucket
http://shipbucket.com/forums/

FD Aircraft 16
http://shipbucket.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=9085
Page 18 of 30

Author:  Hood [ April 7th, 2019, 9:15 am ]
Post subject:  Re: FD Aircraft 16

Nice additions.

Author:  eswube [ April 7th, 2019, 10:40 am ]
Post subject:  Re: FD Aircraft 16

Nice work.

Author:  llamaman2 [ April 7th, 2019, 1:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: FD Aircraft 16

Nice work, guys. I especially like the DC-5 series.

Been toying with the Britten-Norman Trislander since I need it for an AU I'm working on. Borrowed some components from DP's Islander, such as the undercarriage, engine nacelles and windows:

[ img ]

Author:  Hood [ April 7th, 2019, 3:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: FD Aircraft 16

Such a distinctive aircraft! Nice to see it represented here.

Author:  Bordkanone 75 [ April 10th, 2019, 12:30 am ]
Post subject:  Re: FD Aircraft 16

[ img ]
Italy, Aeronautica Umbra Trojani AUT.18
A competitor to any Italian monoplane fighters with a service number ending in "0"

Author:  Bordkanone 75 [ April 12th, 2019, 1:03 am ]
Post subject:  Re: FD Aircraft 16

[ img ]
Italy, Caproni Ca.335 Maestrale
What Belgium wanted before the war.

Author:  Hood [ April 12th, 2019, 7:35 am ]
Post subject:  Re: FD Aircraft 16

Great additions, I love how you bring us these lesser known types that deserve recognition.

Author:  Toxic Loki [ April 14th, 2019, 9:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: FD Aircraft 16

[ img ]

Author:  darthpanda [ April 15th, 2019, 8:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: FD Aircraft 16

Sorry! I was totally forgoten about this plane!
UK - Westland Lynx - UK Land-based variants
[ img ]

Author:  eswube [ April 15th, 2019, 8:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: FD Aircraft 16

@Toxic Loki
To begin with, I'm afraid that Your C-201 is misscaled (all sources I saw give the length to be 13,8m, which is ca. 305 pixels, and on this drawing it's 350 pixels long - nearly 16m long). Besides that, it's also rather crude styllistically. Horizontal stabilizer is full of double black lines (or rather whole black blotches), there are "heavy corners" ( http://shipbucket.com/styleguide#21 ) in some places, curves/arcs also don't look good (for example, upper contour of fuselage looks like it was "pumped up" in the middle, instead of being smooth arc all the way), the antenna masts IMHO should be three pixel thick (and forward one should be outlined in black), and finally, the window frame should be 3-pixel thick instead of just two (it's thick enough to be that wide), plus the forward contour of the windshield should be black because there is a frame there too.

@Darth Panda
Excellent work!

Page 18 of 30 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
https://www.phpbb.com/