Those things were so monstrously hideous that my iPad couldn't even load it! Literally, it couldn't load half of them because they were so large! My suggestion is that we KILL IT WITH FIRE!!!! (and by fire I mean naval gunfire, of course
)
| Shipbucket http://shipbucket.com/forums/ |
|
| Today's picture from the Web! http://shipbucket.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=1266 |
Page 72 of 100 |
| Author: | gordo8000 [ October 25th, 2012, 12:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Today's picture from the Web! |
Those things were so monstrously hideous that my iPad couldn't even load it! Literally, it couldn't load half of them because they were so large! My suggestion is that we KILL IT WITH FIRE!!!! (and by fire I mean naval gunfire, of course )
|
|
| Author: | BB1987 [ October 25th, 2012, 12:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Today's picture from the Web! |
6x 20 inch guns on a 24.000 tons hull? I could not resist and made a SS repost for the "deadnaut" burn, em down laid down 1950 DESIGN FAILURE: Overall load weight too much for hull Displacement: 20.784 t light; 23.232 t standard; 24.062 t normal; 24.726 t full load Dimensions: Length (overall / waterline) x beam x draught (normal/deep) (820,22 ft / 780,84 ft) x 131,23 ft x (16,40 / 16,73 ft) (250,00 m / 238,00 m) x 40,00 m x (5,00 / 5,10 m) Armament: 6 - 19,69" / 500 mm 45,0 cal guns - 3.846,50lbs / 1.744,74kg shells, 150 per gun Breech loading guns in turret on barbette mounts, 1950 Model 3 x Twin mounts on centreline ends, majority forward 2 raised mounts - superfiring 7 - 2,76" / 70,0 mm 45,0 cal guns - 10,55lbs / 4,79kg shells, 450 per gun Quick firing guns in deck and hoist mounts, 1950 Model 7 x Single mounts on sides, evenly spread 6 - 1,97" / 50,0 mm 45,0 cal guns - 3,85lbs / 1,74kg shells, 2.000 per gun Anti-air guns in deck mounts, 1950 Model 6 x Single mounts on sides, evenly spread Weight of broadside 23.176 lbs / 10.512 kg Main Torpedoes 280 - 1,3" / 32 mm, 9,84 ft / 3,00 m torpedoes - 0,242 t each, 67,787 t total In 28 sets of deck mounted carriage/fixed tubes Main DC/AS Mortars 24 - 220,46 lbs / 100,00 kg Depth Charges + 500 reloads - 51,572 t total in Depth charge throwers Armour: - Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg) Main: 25,6" / 650 mm 292,82 ft / 89,25 m 13,75 ft / 4,19 m Ends: Unarmoured Main Belt covers 58% of normal length Main belt does not fully cover magazines and engineering spaces - Torpedo Bulkhead - Additional damage containing bulkheads: 5,91" / 150 mm 292,82 ft / 89,25 m 14,44 ft / 4,40 m Beam between torpedo bulkheads 124,67 ft / 38,00 m - Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max) Main: 5,91" / 150 mm 5,91" / 150 mm 5,91" / 150 mm 2nd: 2,56" / 65 mm 0,59" / 15 mm 0,59" / 15 mm Machinery: Oil fired boilers, steam turbines, Geared drive, 7 shafts, 401.640 shp / 299.623 Kw = 43,00 kts Range 1.000nm at 27,00 kts Bunker at max displacement = 1.493 tons Complement: 965 - 1.255 Cost: £33,081 million / $132,322 million Distribution of weights at normal displacement: Armament: 3.615 tons, 15,0% - Guns: 3.453 tons, 14,3% - Weapons: 162 tons, 0,7% Armour: 8.359 tons, 34,7% - Belts: 5.272 tons, 21,9% - Torpedo bulkhead: 924 tons, 3,8% - Armament: 2.163 tons, 9,0% Machinery: 9.609 tons, 39,9% Hull, fittings & equipment: -798 tons, -3,3% Fuel, ammunition & stores: 3.278 tons, 13,6% Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0,0% Overall survivability and seakeeping ability: Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship): 37 lbs / 17 Kg = 0,0 x 19,7 " / 500 mm shells or 7,1 torpedoes Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1,78 Metacentric height 19,3 ft / 5,9 m Roll period: 12,6 seconds Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 21 % - Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0,39 Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 0,18 Hull form characteristics: Hull has a flush deck, a normal bow and large transom stern Block coefficient (normal/deep): 0,501 / 0,505 Length to Beam Ratio: 5,95 : 1 'Natural speed' for length: 33,38 kts Power going to wave formation at top speed: 67 % Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50 Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 42,00 degrees Stern overhang: 9,84 ft / 3,00 m Freeboard (% = length of deck as a percentage of waterline length): Fore end, Aft end - Forecastle: 47,50%, 32,81 ft / 10,00 m, 29,53 ft / 9,00 m - Forward deck: 19,00%, 29,53 ft / 9,00 m, 29,53 ft / 9,00 m - Aft deck: 18,50%, 29,53 ft / 9,00 m, 29,53 ft / 9,00 m - Quarter deck: 15,00%, 29,53 ft / 9,00 m, 29,53 ft / 9,00 m - Average freeboard: 30,15 ft / 9,19 m Ship space, strength and comments: Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 222,1% - Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 412,5% Waterplane Area: 71.067 Square feet or 6.602 Square metres Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 50% Structure weight / hull surface area: 1 lbs/sq ft or 5 Kg/sq metre Hull strength (Relative): - Cross-sectional: 0,00 - Longitudinal: 0,00 - Overall: 0,00 Extremely poor machinery, storage, compartmentation space Excellent accommodation and workspace room Ship has quick, lively roll, not a steady gun platform Caution: Lacks seaworthiness - very limited seakeeping ability I cannot stop laughing 133 billion dollars for something that would break apart while still inside the slipway
|
|
| Author: | KHT [ October 25th, 2012, 3:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Today's picture from the Web! |
You missed the flanking speed of 43 knots. 
|
|
| Author: | BB1987 [ October 25th, 2012, 3:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Today's picture from the Web! |
it's there, and now higlited 
|
|
| Author: | KHT [ October 25th, 2012, 4:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Today's picture from the Web! |
Oups. Ah, well, the recoil effect won't mess things up at least.
|
|
| Author: | Karle94 [ October 25th, 2012, 8:12 pm ] | |
| Post subject: | Re: Today's picture from the Web! | |
My suggestion is that we KILL IT WITH FIRE!!!! (and by fire I mean naval gunfire, of course
Let`s kill em´ with reality! Something that seems to be an unknown concept to these guys.
) |
||
| Author: | heuhen [ October 25th, 2012, 9:15 pm ] | ||
| Post subject: | Re: Today's picture from the Web! | ||
My suggestion is that we KILL IT WITH FIRE!!!! (and by fire I mean naval gunfire, of course
Let`s kill em´ with reality! Something that seems to be an unknown concept to these guys. )
|
|||
| Author: | Zephyr [ October 25th, 2012, 9:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Today's picture from the Web! |
I've tried. It doesn't work. And isn't there a specific thread for this someplace, other than this one? |
|
| Author: | Zephyr [ October 25th, 2012, 9:17 pm ] | |||
| Post subject: | Re: Today's picture from the Web! | |||
My suggestion is that we KILL IT WITH FIRE!!!! (and by fire I mean naval gunfire, of course
Let`s kill em´ with reality! Something that seems to be an unknown concept to these guys. ) |
||||
| Author: | BB1987 [ October 25th, 2012, 9:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Today's picture from the Web! |
Sorry you are right Zephyr, is this the more appropriate thread to continue? http://www.shipbucket.com/forums/viewto ... &start=390 |
|
| Page 72 of 100 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|