Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 4 of 17  [ 163 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5 617 »
Author Message
Zephyr
Post subject: Re: Shipbucket Ranting threadPosted: February 25th, 2012, 7:26 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1587
Joined: November 22nd, 2011, 4:47 am
Location: Marietta, Georgia - USA
Thiel wrote:
It would certainly be interesting. Though I think it's going to be hard in your case since the post-war* ships we've seen so far have all been designed with USN designations in mind.

*I don't know if there was a WWII equivalent in your universe, but you know what I mean.
Kinda-sorta. It would take too long to explain it here, but I will be going into that in my AU thread as part of my "History of the Grays Harbor Royal Navy" I've been writing and tweaking and re-writing and adjusting for the past several years. Short version, it lasted from April 1940 to August 1944 and was more of a colonial and trade war than an ideological war of total destruction, and was preceeded by the 1936 "6-weeks war", and the Daemontiatian War of 1913-17.

_________________
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Shipbucket Ranting threadPosted: February 25th, 2012, 7:32 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Have you looked at the USN designations list recently? Especially the one from before WWII where each class got its own?
Seriously, there's an entire wiki page about it.
Turns out there's more than 60 different designations for service craft alone.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Demon Lord Razgriz
Post subject: Re: Shipbucket Ranting threadPosted: February 25th, 2012, 7:47 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 446
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 1:18 am
Location: Eastern North Carolina
USN Designations at least has a core designation: CV, BB, C, D, etc. Russians do not, it's gibberish. Only one that seems to be a core designation is PLA(Atomnaya Podvodnaya Lodka(Nuclear-powered Submarine)).

_________________
95% of my drawings are destined for NS, 4.9% for fun, & .1% serious.
Worklist:
Space Shuttle
Atlas V
Delta II/III
Project Constellation
Soyuz series


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Shipbucket Ranting threadPosted: February 25th, 2012, 8:01 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
I don't know, without going too far into the system here's some of the basic categories.
These describes missions, not size.
PL: Submarine
AK: Aircraft Carrier
RK: Missile Ship
PK: ASW ship
SK: Patrol ship

It really isn't that hard to understand once you break it down.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Demon Lord Razgriz
Post subject: Re: Shipbucket Ranting threadPosted: February 25th, 2012, 8:16 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 446
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 1:18 am
Location: Eastern North Carolina
Then Golly needs to add the translations to the site, cause it's still gibberish to anyone not Russian or clinically insane.

_________________
95% of my drawings are destined for NS, 4.9% for fun, & .1% serious.
Worklist:
Space Shuttle
Atlas V
Delta II/III
Project Constellation
Soyuz series


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Gollevainen
Post subject: Re: Shipbucket Ranting threadPosted: February 26th, 2012, 9:39 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4685
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:10 am
Location: Finland
Contact: Website
USN system is standard in In US and NATO countries, but its not worldwide standard, not used in Russia, not in China and not in many other individual languages.

Im gonna make a comprehensive list of each abbrevation, where it comes from, how its translated and what the designation means ;)

_________________
Shipbucket mainsite, aka "The Archive"
New AU project "Aravala"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Hood
Post subject: Re: Shipbucket Ranting threadPosted: February 26th, 2012, 10:11 am
Offline
Posts: 7150
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 10:07 am
I see nothing wrong with that Global Security list, most of those Russian designations have a NATO equal. The entire NATO list and USN designation lists go far beyond pure BB, CCG, CVA etc etc.
Often Western classifications don't match what the Soviet ship actually is, personally I think the Sov/Russian system is more logical while the NATO system is a bit basic and lazy. DDG-FFG-FFL all have blurred boundaries IMO. Yes we are used to them but to give the wrong label to a ship is no more useful.

_________________
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: Shipbucket Ranting threadPosted: February 26th, 2012, 10:18 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
Gollevainen wrote:
USN system is standard in In US and NATO countries, but its not worldwide standard, not used in Russia, not in China and not in many other individual languages.

Im gonna make a comprehensive list of each abbrevation, where it comes from, how its translated and what the designation means ;)
The USN system is not the NATO system.

The USN system is used by the USN, the JMSDF, the RAN, the RoCN, and I think the RoKN. The NATO/Commonwealth system is totally different and maintains unique pennant numbers for every ship in all of the navies that use it.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Gollevainen
Post subject: Re: Shipbucket Ranting threadPosted: February 26th, 2012, 12:08 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4685
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:10 am
Location: Finland
Contact: Website
Yeah I stand corrected Timothy.

_________________
Shipbucket mainsite, aka "The Archive"
New AU project "Aravala"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Novice
Post subject: Re: Shipbucket Ranting threadPosted: February 26th, 2012, 8:07 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4126
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:25 am
Location: Vrijstaat
Even the NATO system during the cold war was dependent on the country using it. The RN using its own designation system while the Marine Nationale had its own (when France was part of NATO). Also what the RN called frigate the USN called an ocean escort, while a frigate for the USN was larger than a RN destroyer. In 1975 the USN Frigates were re-termed as cruisers, which was most probably a political move more than actual re-think of the ships' role.
Soviet designations were usually descriptive of size and role - Malnyy Raketny Kutter means just that "small missile boat" the designation of what in the west were known as Komar and Osa missile boats.

_________________
[ img ] Thank you Kim for the crest

"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 4 of 17  [ 163 posts ]  Return to “Off Topic” | Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5 617 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]