Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 3 of 4  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4 »
Author Message
heuhen
Post subject: Re: DDG-1000 Sea trialsPosted: December 26th, 2015, 5:37 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9064
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
erik_t wrote:
[anyone posts anything about anything]

NORWAYNORWAYNORWAYNORWAYNORWAYNORWAYNORWAYNORWAYNORWAYNORWAYNORWAYNORWAYNORWAY
Every post about absolutely anything in the world, invention or made in, or it was we that come up with the idea....

USAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSA

even on youtube... it's funny that.... must be a sort of inferior complex.

But then I might know where it come from... all those documents I see talking about invention or ideas that some country have invented or improved... but in the reality there was several Norwegians behind it. Or that documentary about the world best special forces that was on the TV for some years ago... where they used actors that purposely made Norwegian special forces look bad, they even had problem with loading a gun!

We was during viking age big and scary, but now.... yeah that's funny.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: DDG-1000 Sea trialsPosted: December 26th, 2015, 8:43 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7497
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
Heuhen, sorry to say, but I somewhat agree with Erik_t on this. You are, and I think you agree if I say it this way, an Norway fanboy. but could you please leave comments in topics that are actually related to the subject? I mean:
heuhen wrote:
while here in Norway and Sweden, we have done it or several years now... it's called the skjold class and Visby class.

Sorry just had to. This is just so old news that I have grown a epic man bear... literally.
this is an vague and unrelated post, I have no idea what you are refering to and for that reason chose to just ignore this post and many others like it. that should not be the purpose of your posts, I suppose, as they take effort to be written haha :P so maybe better to leave them unposted.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
apdsmith
Post subject: Re: DDG-1000 Sea trialsPosted: December 26th, 2015, 10:17 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 855
Joined: August 29th, 2013, 5:58 pm
Location: Manchester, UK
iiradned wrote:
Further examination of the video yields that USS Zumwalt is currently sporting 4 commercial type radars. Two on top the deckhouse forward and one on each aft corner of the hangar.

Hopefully they're only there for the trials and not when she is commissioned.
I don't think anyone's actually addressed this (it kind of went off on a tangent) - if the warship wants to look like a civilian vessel (at least from an emissions perspective) it's probably cheaper to match a civilian set's emissions by just buying a civvie set than trying to coax a mil-spec radar to look like a civvie set, especially given that the requirements for a navigation radar aren't particularly demanding (it may be that for that specific job, a military version would not offer any benefit anyway)

Regards,
Adam

_________________
Public Service Announcement: This is the preferred SB / FD font.
[ img ]
NSWE: viewtopic.php?f=14&t=5695


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: DDG-1000 Sea trialsPosted: December 26th, 2015, 10:27 pm
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
Indeed, a substantially-sized radar return (even one matching a 60ft yacht) that is completely silent electronically is more suspicious than one radiating a nav set.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: DDG-1000 Sea trialsPosted: December 26th, 2015, 10:46 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
And lets not forget that navigation radars are pretty good at just that, navigation. And stuff like RACON signals and SART beacons are only visible on x-band radars.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Western_1
Post subject: Re: DDG-1000 Sea trialsPosted: December 30th, 2015, 2:44 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 122
Joined: October 19th, 2014, 2:49 am
The more I read about the DDG-1000 the angrier I get. Those cost over-runs are downright unacceptable. The Government needs to redesign the Nunn-McCurdy rule so that it is based on percent of cost growth from program induction, not year over year. That might be the kick in the nuts needed to get some of these contractors and designers to do their jobs correctly. Though I am sure plenty of blame likely lies with command not properly outlining their needs beforehand and the constant push to have "swiss army ships" that do everything.

DDG 1000 should have been a 10k ton Type 45 Destroyer with a bigger hull and larger power-plant for future changes. More off the shelf parts, more specialization. Then, make our hardest hitting surface combatant a 30k ton CGN with plenty of room for all the lasers, rail guns, AEGIS replacement, drones and other stuff the navy can think of.

While were at it, no littoral combat ships over a thousand tons. Make a bigger Visby, then call it good on littoral combat ships. The current LCS ships are just really crappy light frigates. Instead, the LCS should be a proper frigate and about 5k tons in size. I would love to see an independence class, but twice as large. Also, give about six to the coast guard as national security cutters.

/rant


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Morten812
Post subject: Re: DDG-1000 Sea trialsPosted: January 1st, 2016, 9:20 pm
Offline
Posts: 281
Joined: September 16th, 2011, 7:02 am
Location: Denmark
Contact: Website
[ img ]

_________________
Morten812

Morten Jensen
Randers
Denmark

Traffic Manager


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Wikipedia & Universe
Post subject: Re: DDG-1000 Sea trialsPosted: May 11th, 2016, 2:19 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 309
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:19 am
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Contact: Website
krases wrote:
While were at it, no littoral combat ships over a thousand tons. Make a bigger Visby, then call it good on littoral combat ships. The current LCS ships are just really crappy light frigates. Instead, the LCS should be a proper frigate and about 5k tons in size. I would love to see an independence class, but twice as large. Also, give about six to the coast guard as national security cutters.

/rant
LCS's are basically corvettes trying to be hipster. Just make some corvettes that are able to punch above their weight, reach relatively high speeds for their size, and do MCM work with a little bit of interdiction.

As for the Zumwalts, I think they're great, but once they realized they could only have a few, they should have shifted the mentality to treating them as neo-Long Beaches: Testbeds that go out and fight.

_________________
Fasismi? Ei! Natsismin? Ei! Kommunismi? Ei! Elostelu!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Hexelarity
Post subject: Re: DDG-1000 Sea trialsPosted: May 11th, 2016, 2:38 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 146
Joined: January 17th, 2016, 8:14 am
Location: Washington state
Most stealthiest ship ive seen

_________________
Wansui!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: DDG-1000 Sea trialsPosted: May 11th, 2016, 3:27 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
Wikipedia & Universe wrote:
LCS's are basically corvettes trying to be hipster. Just make some corvettes that are able to punch above their weight, reach relatively high speeds for their size, and do MCM work with a little bit of interdiction.
No, the LCSes are not, and apostrophes are not for pluralizing. The LCSes are light surface combatants that can defend themselves (as well as any Perry could), while carrying a pair of helos to do things. There are sacrifices for the high speed they were made to reach, but they have proven to not be the horrible monsters that some have made them out to be. Plus, we're getting them in service, which is worth more than any paper study.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 3 of 4  [ 34 posts ]  Return to “Off Topic” | Go to page « 1 2 3 4 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]