Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 1 of 1  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
rifleman2
Post subject: Flight deck placementPosted: August 18th, 2016, 6:00 pm
Offline
Posts: 601
Joined: February 22nd, 2015, 10:26 am
I notice on most Naval vessels that flight decks are placed aft of the superstructure. Isn't there allot of turbulence in that position with exhaust gasses and dirty air coming of the superstructure? What is the Airflow and turbulence like ahead of the superstructure like for example on a container ship? And what are the Pro's /Con's of operating helicopters from either of these positions.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
eswube
Post subject: Re: Flight deck placementPosted: August 18th, 2016, 9:00 pm
Offline
Posts: 10652
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am
One big 'Con' of having flight deck ahead of superstructure is that when ship is underway, if something goes wrong with helicopter landing on 'normal' (aft) pad, it just falls into the water, while when the deck is on bow, the helo falls into the ship's bridge. ;)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Flight deck placementPosted: August 21st, 2016, 1:03 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Turbulence is an issue and most ships are in fact designed to mitigate it, but compared to ship motion it's not that big of an issue.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
citizen lambda
Post subject: Re: Flight deck placementPosted: August 24th, 2016, 3:14 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 467
Joined: March 2nd, 2016, 8:30 pm
There's also certainly the basic fact that helicopters are faster than ships, so have an easier time catching up to them than the other way around, and an approach of the ship from astern reduces differential speed on landing. I know of only a very few unbuilt ship projects that involved a helipad amidships, but nothing that left the drawing board AFAIK.
Might also be that the superstructure shields the helo deck from the airflow along the sides of the ship and over the superstructure, rather than creating turbulence. Look at the Moskva helicopter cruiser to see that a large airflow-blocking superstructure can work. In and of itself, landing on (or at least hovering above) the bow deck is often possible, as illustrated by the countless USN ships with VERTREP spots forward. The main problems for basing helos forward on warships are probably that the pad can't be isolated from the bow waves without raising the silhouette, and that any helo hangar with a forward opening is an invitation to major flooding in heavy seas.

_________________
Soviet Century/Cold War 2020 Alternate Universe: Soviet and other Cold War designs 1990-2020.
My Worklist


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 1 of 1  [ 4 posts ]  Return to “Off Topic”

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]